10 questions that every intelligent christian must answer

[juanamangga]

---

ayaw gud pagboot kay i am trying to ask the atheist,
mr rodsky was okay with me asking him so i guess the TS will be okay with it

hahahah! superlike!

[butong101]

OT: mabasahan baya mos mga tinod nga expert sa kani na field.. mauwaw ta.. nyehehehe

[yiennahs]

hahahah! superlike!

yanong is insecure, go to the insecurity thread, you're lost bro

OnT.
nakabantay man gud ko that your science is really complicated (when trying to find out the creation of the universe ba) it's like just a pinpoint. Once something is discovered, you have to dig it to the deepest jud. But, knowing that i have a God, an existence of another life form is simple: God made another set of creatures for us to learn something.

[juanamangga]

the universe is really wide,
now if the aliens have their own science then they will also have their own way of explaining how the universe was created.

Since science is suppose to be facts and now there is another fact from them then how can you conclude who is telling the truth?

They have their own lives and owning their own set of language, tools or anything. You cannot say that they have the exact same features like us.

Who knows, maybe they also have their own religion.

Now if man found out that there is indeed advance life forms,will that conclude the fact that science created the universe?

So ang mahitabo, we have another set of complicated problems like how they exist... and that would be solved when?

mao na ang nakacomplicate sa science! reliable naman sad ang idea sa big bang due to the theories of relativity and some other things that brilliant scientists were able to develop.

we don't know yet kung naay advanced life forms sa laing parts sa milky way, or other galaxies.

heck, wala ta kahibaw if this universe we are living is just another part of the multiverse! it will still take a lot of time to explain everything. but science is on the right track baby, it was born that way!

[juanamangga]

OT: mabasahan baya mos mga tinod nga expert sa kani na field.. mauwaw ta.. nyehehehe

walay angay ikauwaw coz we are only sharing what we know.

once we are in this forum we are waiving our opinions to be corrected, sakto ba?

[yiennahs]

mao na ang nakacomplicate sa science! reliable naman sad ang idea sa big bang due to the theories of relativity and some other things that brilliant scientists were able to develop.

we don't know yet kung naay advanced life forms sa laing parts sa milky way, or other galaxies.

heck, wala ta kahibaw if this universe we are living is just another part of the multiverse! it will still take a lot of time to explain everything. but science is on the right track baby, it was born that way!

hahahaha i just hope that if maabot mo kay dili gate sa Ginoo inyong makit-an hehehe

[yiennahs]

u did your research well..
i myself found a study who challenges the evolution theory of Charles Darwin..
i won't go to specifics lang. their opposition/criticism to the theory goes like this..

Ape's structural attributes, its nervous system, the brains is almost completely similar to Man's, thus, Man is an evolution of ape.. as explained in the natural selection theory..

the study argued, that the logic is erroneous.. using the same logic used as above, they make this quiet funny analogy

Water melon is almost completely similar as to Earths physical attributes.. which is almost totally made up of water, is earth an evolution of water melon?

clouds is almost completely similar to earth's physical composition viz water..
is earth an evolution of clouds?

seriously though, they are on the process of negating the darwinian evolution theory.. just imagine its implications if this new study findings is true..

ergo logic is not reliable hehehee

[butong101]

walay angay ikauwaw coz we are only sharing what we know.

once we are in this forum we are waiving our opinions to be corrected, sakto ba?

sakto brad..

i just hope that we will move forward.. child-like nman gd kau cge ta question for the same thing nga dugay na na answeran.. the answer is simple.. deadlock.. dead end.. no consensus reached.. would always boil down to each debater's philosophical inclination.. dba ang atheism is by itself philosophy man

so why the so called atheist have to make this provocative statements (10 questions).. nindot unta kung constructive tanan.. but reading some of the responses they seemed to feel superior.. they seemed to quote alot of scientific references as if to imply that the other side are dumb(in the sense that they are not aware of that scientific fact).. geez.. too elementary and its all over the net for any of us not to know..

my point is, debate for and against a religion would have been better if its point of reference is fair and leveled..

lets try to evaluate the 10 questions, its crystal clear that behind it there is an ulterior motive already meant to bash religion..

[LeeLeePot]

life makes sense to me

birth -> play -> school -> play -> school -> school -> work -> work -> work -> work -> work -> work -> work -> work -> play -> work -> play -> work -> work ->work -> work -> work -> work ->work -> work -> work -> work -> retire -> play -> die

that's life

kaboring ani nga life nimo TS oi...

well here's mine...

birth- play- school - play - school - vega - school - laag - school - drugs - school - istokwa - school - work - shop - work - team bldg - work- fukc - work - marriage - work - kids - work - resign - write a book... lingaw nuh? hehehe...

you should make the best out of it and not complain and ask questions...hehehe...

[ReikoChan]

42 pages and counting. Man, I missed a lot.