Questions for the Atheists

[kajrot1]

---

let's not take it personal
ayaw dibdiba
sa lain bitaw thread opposite to this thread di mo react pero dri masuko man
anyways wala man cguroy mayng laki dri kung d katubag d wala, nothing to lose

[kajrot1]

and why some people would label atheism as a "group".....

and the most "stupid" part, mangita'g "proof"..... sweet cheesus......

kamo lay pwd mangayg proof ani ron?
sakto ba na

[behemothharr]

kapoy kaayo mag lalis basta religion nay hisgotan oi.walay kahumaman!

[lingkwyz]

kapoy kaayo mag lalis basta religion nay hisgotan oi.walay kahumaman!

d mani religion topic sir.. hehe

[lingkwyz]

kamo lay pwd mangayg proof ani ron?
sakto ba na

if there is nothing sir, what would you find?
nothing pud sir diba?

but if someone tells you there was something and you didn't experience it,
would you believe it right away? or ask..

atheists go for the nothing

theist say there was somebody/something to create the everything

so in short sir, the burden of proof is on the theists sir.. IMHO

[yanong_banikanhon]

if there is nothing sir, what would you find?
nothing pud sir diba?
atheists go for the nothing...he burden of proof is on the theists sir.. IMHO

Wala man ta nag-crossword or scrabble diri, bay. So please don't play with words. Giunsa gud pagka-nothing sa position sa mga atheist nga extra-ordinary man ang ilang claim:

Atheists assert that life comes from lifeless chemicals through a random process WITHOUT the aid of any intelligence.

Asa man ang 'nothing' ana? Kun 'nothing' pa, dili unta mo mohimo ana nga assertion. It is not even a negative claim, but a positive one. Sama sa inyong mantra, an extra-ordinary claim requires extra-ordinary evidence. Kay inyoha man nang assertion, so the burden of proof is also yours.

Para makabarog kanang inyong assertion, pakitai kuno mi'g evidence that would prove beyond reasonable doubt that life can ONLY come through a random process and not from any intelligent source.

[Saint_hard]

or maybe he should read the first post of the TS, dili lang kay modiritso ug post post lang diha...

[lingkwyz]

Wala man ta nag-crossword or scrabble diri, bay. So please don't play with words. Giunsa gud pagka-nothing sa position sa mga atheist nga extra-ordinary man ang ilang claim:

Atheists assert that life comes from lifeless chemicals through a random process WITHOUT the aid of any intelligence.

Asa man ang 'nothing' ana? Kun 'nothing' pa, dili unta mo mohimo ana nga assertion. It is not even a negative claim, but a positive one. Sama sa inyong mantra, an extra-ordinary claim requires extra-ordinary evidence. Kay inyoha man nang assertion, so the burden of proof is also yours.

Para makabarog kanang inyong assertion, pakitai kuno mi'g evidence that would prove beyond reasonable doubt that life can ONLY come through a random process and not from any intelligent source.

hehe.. it says IMHO sir, correct me if i'm wrong.. why so flabbergash about my opinion?

why man you and the likes of you sir kay, kung di sarcastic, arrogant mu sturya.. can't we talk with decency and maturity?

sorry sir.. mao na no resolution ani nga topic.. IMHO again..

[lingkwyz]

Wala man ta nag-crossword or scrabble diri, bay. So please don't play with words. Giunsa gud pagka-nothing sa position sa mga atheist nga extra-ordinary man ang ilang claim:

Atheists assert that life comes from lifeless chemicals through a random process WITHOUT the aid of any intelligence.

Asa man ang 'nothing' ana? Kun 'nothing' pa, dili unta mo mohimo ana nga assertion. It is not even a negative claim, but a positive one. Sama sa inyong mantra, an extra-ordinary claim requires extra-ordinary evidence. Kay inyoha man nang assertion, so the burden of proof is also yours.

Para makabarog kanang inyong assertion, pakitai kuno mi'g evidence that would prove beyond reasonable doubt that life can ONLY come through a random process and not from any intelligent source.

as for me sir, im wasn't talking about life per se. i was referring to the item called GOD. existence of god for me is invalid. unless proven otherwise. IMHO nasad ni ha..

[yanong_banikanhon]

why man you and the likes of you sir kay, kung di sarcastic, arrogant mu sturya.. can't we talk with decency and maturity?

Kay sarcastic ug arrogant man pud ang mga atheists kun maka-pabor. Basa-basahan dayon ka nila sa libro ni Stephen Hawking or ingnon ka nga mag-study og evolution 101. Feeling nila sila ra'y duna'y capacity maka-digest og mga scientific literatures.

existence of god for me is invalid. unless proven otherwise

Pwede nimo i-share ang logical proof nga tinuod nga invalid ang existence of GOD unless proven otherwise? Unsa ma'y basis nimo ana nga statement?