Questions for the Atheists

[silent-kill]

---

Naa ka ba'y ebidensya nga ang balas sa daplin sa baybay gikan sa mga bato sa bukid?

You cannot produce evidence that takes hundreds and thousands or even millions of years to develop, just as you cannot prove that the very grains of sand in palm of your hand was part of a rock on a mountaintop millions of years ago--but the science of geology tells us this is so.

-RODION

hilig man gud na silag magic2x nga explination rodz hehe mao na

[rodsky]

hilig man gud na silag magic2x nga explination rodz hehe mao na

We don't need magic--we just need ample time and the right tools, and the patient and capable people to investigate. People such as Craig Venter and others at The Institute for Genomic Research, who are actually working on a method that involves engineering existing prokaryotic cells with progressively fewer genes, attempting to discern at which point the most minimal requirements for life were reached. It's a long and painstaking process, not for the impatient and those who seek "instant" answers, and I suggest that we just sit and wait patiently (or encourage your grandkids to be genetic engineers! LOL) for the results, but I'm confident they'll get to that point within my lifetime.

-RODION

[nowpress*]

We don't have to prove anything, sir.

the usual answer i get from people who can't defend their position.

[THE SKULLS]

Naa ka ba'y ebidensya nga ang balas sa daplin sa baybay gikan sa mga bato sa bukid?

You cannot produce evidence that takes hundreds and thousands or even millions of years to develop, just as you cannot prove that the very grains of sand in palm of your hand was part of a rock on a mountaintop millions of years ago--but the science of geology tells us this is so.

-RODION

so, you believed in anything science dictates? am I right rods?

[THE SKULLS]

We don't need magic--we just need ample time and the right tools, and the patient and capable people to investigate. People such as Craig Venter and others at The Institute for Genomic Research, who are actually working on a method that involves engineering existing prokaryotic cells with progressively fewer genes, attempting to discern at which point the most minimal requirements for life were reached. It's a long and painstaking process, not for the impatient and those who seek "instant" answers, and I suggest that we just sit and wait patiently (or encourage your grandkids to be genetic engineers! LOL) for the results, but I'm confident they'll get to that point within my lifetime.

-RODION

magic comes with the term trick. it's for me. and trickery doesn't go with impossibility. And I'm happy to learn accidentally with patience.

[nowpress*]

Hahaha.... pag sure diha oi... Ka klaro anang best ways to prove what is true or false is by using logic, evidence and facts... Unsa man diay imong gamiton pagkahibaw pananglitan na chismis imong asawa nga naay kabit tinood ba or dli?

Ikaw ra may gabalik balik sa imong istorya...

Tinuod ka dli na mo ma prove nga naay god, kay walay possible way nga ma prove na... PERO walay ebidensya o proof nga ni exist ng butanga... Gi unsa diay nimo pagkahibaw nga dli tinuod si Shiva, Thor, Zeus ug uban pa nya ang imong ginoo ra maoy ni exist?

it's amazing to see you mentioned the use of Logic and yet unable to provide logical explanation for your position.

again... you guys claim...there is no God...how can we know this is true?

how do we know there is God? Intelligent Design requires Intelligent Designer, that's logic.

Dumb Chemicals produced Intelligent Creation, now that's dumb, its illogical.

so now your turn, do you believe there is no God? prove it. don't give me the usual excuse of "we don't need to prove anything" , that's for lazy people. You stated an assumption w/c is "there is no God" now prove it.

[rodsky]

so, you believed in anything science dictates? am I right rods?

Of course not. As usual, you mistake science for some kind of authoritative body that people like me bow to, when in fact it's just a tool. One has a brain, and one uses what one have learned since childhood about the scientific method, and try to see if the report coming in from the scientific community is indeed sound and follows the scientific method--if they don't then you reject them, simple as that--if they do conform, then accept. If you have trouble trying to utilize the tool, then it's your shortcoming, not the tool's.

-RODION

[nowpress*]

Naa ka ba'y ebidensya nga ang balas sa daplin sa baybay gikan sa mga bato sa bukid?

You cannot produce evidence that takes hundreds and thousands or even millions of years to develop, just as you cannot prove that the very grains of sand in palm of your hand was part of a rock on a mountaintop millions of years ago--but the science of geology tells us this is so.

-RODION

no evidence, thank you for being honest, you are taking this into your brain w/o any proof therefore you are acting by faith.

now I rather believe in an Intelligent Designer than believe in something dumb.

Dumb Chemicals producing intelligent life? tsk tsk. I think this is more magical.

[rodsky]

no evidence, thank you for being honest, you are taking this into your brain w/o any proof therefore you are acting by faith.

now I rather believe in an Intelligent Designer than believe in something dumb.

Dumb Chemicals producing intelligent life? tsk tsk. I think this is more magical.

Who said I'm relying on faith? All I'm doing is waiting for an answer from those working on the problem (and in fact if I had the expertise and the background to help them work on the problem, I'd be working on it faster than you'd bat an eyelid), and (happily enough) I'm not as impatient as you are.

-RODION

[pinoy_09]

the usual answer i get from people who can't defend their position.

You might as well ask me to defend my unbelief in Zeus or Krishna.

"What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof."

-Christopher Hitchens