conspiracy theories

[treize]

---

you start by opening your mind to the evidences.
and keep on asking questions, eventually youll get to the truth.

Even if your mind is open, what makes think that the answers you were getting from asking questions were the truth?

[Soul Doctor]

Even if your mind is open, what makes think that the answers you were getting from asking questions were the truth?

hopeless na ka sir.
i-close na lang gud na imong mind.
Kay anha man ka comfortable diha.
Anha man ka malipay.
People usaually denies the truth even if it stares them in the face
because sometimes truth hurts. Sometimes its not what we want to see or hear.

[King]

nakakita nako sa documentary video sa 911 terrorist, and i am convinced that 911 is not a terrorist attack.
but wala pa ko kabalo sa facts or docu anang duha nga gisulti sa TS.

any link please about JFK.

oh i found the link in youtube mythbuster still watching posting it first [loading...]


@TS above
quote sad ko agree ko sa imong gisulti kay ang ubang tao kay one-sided man ang ilang reasonings or perspective, kung unsa lang ang ilang ganahan mahibaw.an mao ra ilang dawaton ug dili na mausab ilang huna2x

update:
mythbuster busted the conspiracy theory of the moon landing.

[kajrot1]

d diay jd tinuod naka landing cla armstrong sa moon

[King]

according sa mythbuster, the conspiracy theory is busted. meaning tinuod ang photo nga nacapture sa moon. but i found this YouTube - ‪Banned in America: Proof of Fake Moonlanding‬‏ why they fake their conversation and live feeds which is delayed

but actually what i really know is...they've record their journey not before they land but after they land. meaning girecord nila ang ilang journey padulong na sila ug uli sa earth. mao ra ako nahinumduman. but i didnt know if that is a theory also or fact.

[krstn is sensen]

so basig peke pud ang news na patay na si bin laden?

[xavisimao]

apil2 ko dri ha, wala koy lingaw, il just share my opinion..

"when do you see a fire with white smoke all around?"
- kung ang raw diesel nimo sa sakyanan mogawas sa exhaust nga unburned.
-kung naay tubig, mahimong steam ang tubig given na init 100C sa atmospheric pressure.
-sa flare sa planta pag sobra ang steam for ionization
- "cold" combustion

"if there was a real fire with intense heat enough to melt a concrete cement covered (aside from the asbestos foamed covering the) steel frames. what would be the color of the smoke?"

-first jet fuel burns around 426 -816 C , ang melting temp sa steel around 1510 C... (ingon diay sa report nangatunaw ang steel?) u dont need to melt the steel frame of a tower para mapa collapse nimo, they just have to lose some of their structural strenght, gamay ra na exposure sa heat kaya na na. ur a chemical engineer, u know na if ma expose sa init metal will expand at both ends, pero pag dili na cya maka expand it will sag and the surrounding concrete cracks. 50% sa steel strenght mawala na at 523 C, around 900 C 10% na lang bilin. dili lang kay ang jet fuel ang nasunog ato hasta mga combustibles material nga naa sa palibot, so mas taas ang temp ato than 800, probably around 900- 1000. ang jet fuel ang ignition source pero ang pagkasunog sa mga combustibles maoy responsible sa heat transfer paingon sa ubos.color of smoke, brownish to black.

"what is the color of the smoke in the 911 wtc building?"

naay black og naay brown/grey

"the presence of white smoke indicates that combustion is incomplete,
or not enough oxygen to burn all molecules of whatever is combustible element or compound present in the building.
that alone is proof that there was no intense fire and heat"

white smoke? ur prefering sa brown/dusty smoke? incomplte combustion doc kay black man ang smoke dba? white smoke kay indication water evaporating( dont know unsay humidity didto ana nga time)
basin ur refering white smoke sa engine start, pareho s gimention nkosa taas na pag maka escape ang raw diesel ( vapour cloud). ur asking proof of intense fire enough mo melt sa steel right para mo collapse ang tower? again, dili need og melting temp para maka collapse.

"in fact in the video of the building collapsing, all you see are white smoke of dust."

-there u are "white smoke of dust", sko mata brown/grey

"and if the plane is the source of the fuel that burns and melt the steel frames,
how did it reached the ground floor and melt the frames there too?"

-yes the plane or the jet fuel maoy source sa pag burn, but not melting the steel frames, how did it reached the ground, naay mga reporter nakakita nga na down ang elevator pag abri naay kalayo, xmpre ang jet fuel na wala dayon ma ignite naog gyud, source sa heat (not intense enough to melt) but tangtang ang strenght sa steel. why mahugdo ang isa ka tower? sa video na una nag collapse kay ang taas sa floor nga nabangaan dba? once nagsugod og collapse ang sa taas, tanan weight atong floor sa taas paingon gyud sa ubos na intact pa, wa nakayanan sa kato na floor tanan energy( pag collapse sa taas) og ang init nga nagpahumok na, aw chain reaction gyud collapse paingon sa ubos. sa engineering ang tawag ana kay "pancaking" dba? and it does not require an explosion to begin.

tanan building contain huge volume of air, while nahitabo ang "pancaking" kato nga volume sa air, uban sa concrete og uban pa butang nga na pulverized sa force sa collpase ni eject sa building with enourmous energy.mao nga nakita to nga "cloud", maka ingon kag controlled demolition ang nahitabo. but mao na effect sa pancaking.



"because in the ground floor of the building are part of the steel frames that are cut and not bent or melted.
they were cut demolition style using what is possibly thermite"

cut jud doc? basin na bend?

hehehe...enough said...pawned

[Soul Doctor]

nakakita nako sa documentary video sa 911 terrorist, and i am convinced that 911 is not a terrorist attack.
but wala pa ko kabalo sa facts or docu anang duha nga gisulti sa TS.

any link please about JFK.

oh i found the link in youtube mythbuster still watching posting it first [loading...]


@TS above
quote sad ko agree ko sa imong gisulti kay ang ubang tao kay one-sided man ang ilang reasonings or perspective, kung unsa lang ang ilang ganahan mahibaw.an mao ra ilang dawaton ug dili na mausab ilang huna2x

update:
mythbuster busted the conspiracy theory of the moon landing.

myth busters was paid 2 million dollars by Nasa just to produce an episode debunking the conspiracy theory.
But ask yourself, why would they do that?
Why are they affected?

And the reflector they saw in the moon is easy to throw from earth.
Anytime they can throw a dozen of that. thats what they did to the unmanned original lunar modules that crash landed on the moon. though some of it missed the moon and is now in orbit between earth and mars.

[Soul Doctor]

d diay jd tinuod naka landing cla armstrong sa moon

pangutan-on tika,
kung ikaw si armstrong ug gikan lang ka sa moon unsay imong buhaton?
Di ba proud ka nga manabi sa mga tawo nga nakaland mo sa moon?

opposite and behavior ni armstrong.
Wala siya magpakita sa mga tawo.
Dili sad siya ganahan magpainterview.
Mag-painterview lang siya kung ang gobyerno na ang mosugo niya.

Nganu kaha?
Di ba kahibulongan?
Human nature man gud nato nga maproud ta sa atong accomplishments, bisan unsa ka gamay.
Pero ang makaadto kag buwan, dili bastabasta nga acomplishment.
Samot unta nga angay ka nga maproud. Di ba?

[butong101]

murag nindot ni da. akong sugdon ug basa sa page one, reserve lang usa nko akong reaction/comments.