Page 60 of 232 FirstFirst ... 505758596061626370 ... LastLast
Results 591 to 600 of 2311
  1. #591

    Default Re: Questions for the Atheists


    ^^ Pataka man lang ka'g tubag, oy. Ang gipangutana ni kajrot1, asa makita sa Bible, DILI asa makita sa Wikipedia!

    Ay ko ingna wala pud ka kabalo sa kalainan sa bible ug wikipedia. Musamot na gyud among pagduda sa imong kahibalo. Tsk.tsk.tsk.

  2. #592
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    260

    Default Re: Questions for the Atheists

    ask lng ko sa mga ateyista, di diay to tinood ang na discover na
    >Noah's Ark (the Durupınar site, located 18.25 miles south of Mount Ararat)
    >The location of Sodom and Gomorrah and the other (3) Cities of the Plain: Zoar, Zeboim and Admah,
    >The site of the Israelites' crossing of the Red Sea (located in the Gulf of Aqaba)
    >Chariot wheels and other relics of the army of Pharaoh at the bottom of the Red Sea
    >A chamber at the end of a maze of tunnels under Jerusalem containing artefacts from Solomon's Temple
    etc.. naa man mga evidence ana oi..

    ug ang katong spear na gigamit sa pag duslak didto sa lawas ni Jesus ky preserve mn gani...so meaning tinood jd ang bible...

  3. #593
    Juana, klaro kaayo ang pangutana asa gibutang sa Bible nya nihatag ka ug link sa Wikipedia.

    So is Wikipedia your Bible??

    Gasugod nasad ka ha....

  4. #594

    Default Re: Questions for the Atheists

    naa na diha ang answers sa link nga akong giprovide

    wa koy talent fee to explain everything!

  5. #595

    Default Re: Questions for the Atheists

    ^^ask google..

    google will tel u na naa sa wikipedia ang mga tubag..??sakto ba?nyahahahaha

  6. #596
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    260

    Default Re: Questions for the Atheists

    wikipedia, bisag kinsa ra mn ang maka edit ana

  7. #597
    Quote Originally Posted by florida.blanca View Post
    naa na diha ang answers sa link nga akong giprovide

    wa koy talent fee to explain everything!
    Really?? Gikapoy na ka? Had enough attention for today?

    You should probably switch hobbies. Get into fashion and hair-make-up stuff or something. 'Coz in a forum you WILL EXPLAIN your arguments.

  8. #598
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    260

    Default Re: Questions for the Atheists

    hahaiz lady gaga mn gro na

  9. #599

    Default Re: Questions for the Atheists

    Taasa na oi, di na ko ka apas tsk! tsk! tsk!.. limited nalang kaayo akong time maka online..

    Share lang ko og gamay, kay nakabantay ko murag naabot naman put ta og evolution.. ngita man gyud mo og proof about evolution here's the proof from an evolutionist...

    This one's for florida.blanca

    One Base Strand
    Evolution had a very serious problem in the 1970's. There wasn't one piece of biological evidence supporting the evolution of life. Then someone discovered in the late 1970's that every living organism on this planet has the same base strand of DNA. Evolutionists quickly grabbed hold of this as biological proof that we all have one common ancestor. It became their biological banner.

    You have to understand that evolution is a random process which requires the use of mathematics to analyze its probability. So, instead of blindly swallowing this claim, I decided to analyze the claim with the use of genetics and mathematics to see if it really proves evolution or does it actually prove creation (remember that at this time I was still an evolutionist.) Below is my analysis.

    In one strand of DNA there are more than one billion molecules with 1/3 of them being the programming nitrogen bases. Since there are four different nitrogen bases used for the programming, we have 333+ million to the fourth power different possible molecular structures which equals 122.9637 x 10 to the 32nd power. For simplicity's sake, I rounded this down to 122 x 10 to the 32nd power. It actually works out to the advantage of the evolutionists giving them the benefit of the doubt.

    This is very important because, in a random process, any and all of the different structures can come into existence at the same time. Now let's make a very conservative assumption favoring evolution that only one in one billion of these structures could support any form of living organism. To do this you subtract the number of zeros in one billion (9) from the exponent 32. This equals 23, so we still have 122 x 10 to the 23rd power possible DNA strands that should have come into existence at the same time.

    Next we make another very conservative assumption favoring evolution that only one in one billion of these strands would have survived four billion years of evolution. This means that for every DNA strand that survived until today, 999,999,999 strands became extinct which is extremely conservative. This would be a very high rate of extinction. That leaves us with 122 x 10 to the 14th power which is 122 with 14 zeros behind it. It would look like this: 12,200,000,000,000,000. There is a little problem with this; there are only two to three million different species on the planet or 2,000,000 to 3,000,000.

    With this in mind, by the most phenomenally conservative estimate which grossly favors evolution to the extreme, there must be tens of thousands of different base strands of DNA for evolution to be true. This is an absolute requirement.

    The concept of one ancestor violates the fundamental principles of a random process in relation to genetics and mathematic probabilities. For evolution to be true it is required that there be so many different base strands of DNA that we must be able to accurately place every organism on Earth into a specific genetic family and not be able to move species around the way evolutionists do today.

    Then how do you get one base strand in all organisms?

    Let's say we go where man has never gone before to the planet I mentioned on the page for the feasibility analysis. When we decide to use molecular construction of living organisms to farm life on our new planet, would you reinvent a new base strand of DNA for each new organism or use the same base strand and simply make the modifications and additional strands needed for each new organism? Of course you are not going to reinvent the DNA strand every time you create a new organism. That would be stupid. So every organism on our planet would have the same base strand. Therefore, a single base strand of DNA for all organisms proves creation by design and disproves evolution. On the other hand, I guess this does mean that we all had one common ancestor...God. See, we evolutionists were partly right.

    Very nice site.. I hope you'll read the introduction, perspective, objectivity and note before you proceed..

    http://www.hauns.com/~DCQu4E5g/Creation.html#Topics

    Good Luck... Ciao...

  10. #600

    Default Re: Questions for the Atheists

    Double post......
    Last edited by treize; 06-21-2011 at 05:38 PM.

  11.    Advertisement

Similar Threads

 
  1. Question for the ladies
    By megarush in forum Relationships (Old)
    Replies: 141
    Last Post: 01-19-2011, 11:19 AM
  2. Marry Me - a question for the guys and girls
    By kCee in forum Relationships (Old)
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-01-2010, 11:29 PM
  3. Question for the mind
    By KaRoger in forum General Discussions
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-26-2008, 11:31 PM
  4. a question for the pierced ones...
    By Master_Bazz in forum Trends & Fashion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-20-2008, 02:10 PM
  5. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-29-2007, 11:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top