Questions for the Atheists

[florida.blanca]

---

You mean randomly?

random is the result kung ngano daghan ang types sa species sa atong planet. who knows, wa ta kibaw if sa mga exoplanets nga madiscover sa NASA, naay life form.

[SioDenz]

random is the result kung ngano daghan ang types sa species sa atong planet. who knows, wa ta kibaw if sa mga exoplanets nga madiscover sa NASA, naay life form.

So meaning our Science and Knowledge is Limited, right?
So my question is, Is it rational to explain absolute truth using our science and knowledge which is Limited?

Do you believe that we humans are created by random reaction of earths elements?

[nowpress*]

Huh? There are evidences nga naay Ginoo? Asa'y evidence kato imong tubag nako nga "the air we breathe" lol that's not enough evidence, sir.

Ok. Since there is no proof, then there is no reason to say that this phrase "the source is God" is true. You are employing this:

God of the gaps - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Creation itself sir evidence na siya nga naay Ginoo. This Universe requires super intelligence para ma create.

but we can use evidence lagi sir. if you found a jacket in my car it means nga gikan ko didto. if there is Creation there is Creator. di ba logcial man? lisod man pod mosolti ta nga gikan na sa mga Dumb chemcials.

di nana mahimong god of the gaps sir kong mo follow ta sa logic. if ang evidence mo suggest gani nga naay nagbohat then ang god of the gaps would sound illogical na.

[florida.blanca]

So meaning our Science and Knowledge is Limited, right?
So my question is, Is it rational to explain absolute truth using our science and knowledge which is Limited?

science have been falsifying the doctrines of the religions, sir. sa una, ang mga tawo nagtuo nga ang mga anghel maghilak if mag-uwan. nya kung naay thunder kay nagtuo ang mga tawo nga ang mga ginoo nagbowling sa kalangitan. science has proven that these are natural phenomenas and walay labot sa divine intervention or some sort of religious BS.

we might not have the answers yet if there is really extraterrestrial life or life forms in other parts of our galaxy, but tell you what sir, scientific breakthroughs are happening every day. it is just awaiting for some concrete evidences, and to think nga kita ra ang buhi sa whole enormous universe, you think it's being selfish? preposterous kaayo sir kung ang Ginoo gipili ra niya ang usa ka minute speck sa universe para diha niya ibutang ang iyang creations!

[florida.blanca]

Does the fossils proving that humans came from Apes already discovered? if so, why man wala pa nahimung Law ang Theory of evolution? can you give us some links that the Theory of Evolution is already a fact therefore accepted by the Whole scientific community around the world? wheres the Proof?

leave it to the paleontologists!

and tell you what, man was not made from dust! our body is comprised of 70% water. that's the reason i don't believe in the story of creation.

and the universe, as what your bible says, is 6,000 years old? c'mon!

the light being emitted by the andromeda galaxy took 2.5 million years to reach us, that's because the distance of the andromeda from the milky way is 2.5 million light years.

that's a clear evidence that our planet is not 6,000 years old! as what your bible says!

6,000 years? that's crazy!

[Sand Man]

science have been falsifying the doctrines of the religions, sir.

Really? How does science 'falsify' religious doctrines? Did scientists dig up and edit a few lines in the ancient scrolls and then buried them back before they were discovered?

we might not have the answers yet if there is really extraterrestrial life or life forms in other parts of our galaxy, but tell you what sir, scientific breakthroughs are happening every day.

Can you tell us, for the record and for the benefit of everyone who is reading this and who has a slight idea of who you are, what scientific breakthroughs happened last Sunday, yesterday, and today?

[nowpress*]

science have been falsifying the doctrines of the religions, sir. sa una, ang mga tawo nagtuo nga ang mga anghel maghilak if mag-uwan. nya kung naay thunder kay nagtuo ang mga tawo nga ang mga ginoo nagbowling sa kalangitan. science has proven that these are natural phenomenas and walay labot sa divine intervention or some sort of religious BS.

wala man pod na sa bible mam/sir nga ang owan gikan sa mga hilak sa angels.

we might not have the answers yet if there is really extraterrestrial life or life forms in other parts of our galaxy, but tell you what sir, scientific breakthroughs are happening every day. it is just awaiting for some concrete evidences, and to think nga kita ra ang buhi sa whole enormous universe, you think it's being selfish? preposterous kaayo sir kung ang Ginoo gipili ra niya ang usa ka minute speck sa universe para diha niya ibutang ang iyang creations!

but we can't trust it sir/mam. kay sige og change ang science.

[florida.blanca]

Really? How does science 'falsify' religious doctrines? Did scientists dig up and edit a few lines in the ancient scrolls and then buried them back before they were discovered?



Can you tell us, for the record and for the benefit of everyone who is reading this and who has a slight idea of who you are, what scientific breakthroughs happened last Sunday, yesterday, and today?

how bout ang doctrine sa creation? nga nabuhat ang kalibutan for only 7 days? wow! in an instant! murag lucky me mami rich chicken noodles? char sad! nya ang tawo gikan sa dust? nga klaro baya jud nga ang atong body nagcomprise of 70% water. water is not dust!

sa imong second question, i don't know. di man ko scientist tawon oi! maypa adto ka mangutana sa mga scientist! a simple generalization in every scientific method is considered a breakthrough. nya kaning mga scientist for sure man sad oi kada adlaw naa silay conclusions out of those experiments and hypothesis nga ilang buhaton!

[nowpress*]

how bout ang doctrine sa creation? nga nabuhat ang kalibutan for only 7 days? wow! in an instant! murag lucky me mami rich chicken noodles? char sad! nya ang tawo gikan sa dust? nga klaro baya jud nga ang atong body nagcomprise of 70% water. water is not dust!

dust of the earth pasabot ana mam is gikan ta sa earth and ang earth mam/sir has water.

dili diay possible nga mabuhat ang kalibotan w/in 7 days if dili possible can you explain why?

sa imong second question, i don't know. di man ko scientist tawon oi! maypa adto ka mangutana sa mga scientist! a simple generalization in every scientific method is considered a breakthrough. nya kaning mga scientist for sure man sad oi kada adlaw naa silay conclusions out of those experiments and hypothesis nga ilang buhaton!

and it does change, not reliable.

[florida.blanca]

dust of the earth pasabot ana mam is gikan ta sa earth and ang earth mam/sir has water.

dili diay possible nga mabuhat ang kalibotan w/in 7 days if dili possible can you explain why?



and it does change, not reliable.

dili imposible nga ang earth mabuhat within 7 days oi! with those creatures and the animals, imposible kaayo! binuang na kaayo na. kana silang adam ug eve, in an instant niappear na lang in the sixth day? tama ba? nga ang tawo nabuhat on the sixth day? or whatever it is imposible kaayo! wala sila niagig pagka-baby?

kanang dust klaro kaayo nga dust ang gipasabot sa bible oi! abug! so para makabuhat ug tawo magcollect na lang tag dust sa kwarto para makabuhat sad tag tawo? kuyawa!

science changes? or innovates? hmmm.. not reliable? so ayaw na lang ug rely sa mga tambal if ever naa kay hilanat coz those medicines you are taking are the product of science