Questions for the Atheists

[nowpress*]

---

Wa man siguro ko'y gi mention nga "proof" sa akong first nga reply nimo sa "logic" topic. Coz personally, I prefer the word "evidence".

So kung ni ana ko nga I was asking for "proof", would that have made your answer different? Or balik lang gihapon mo sa CIRCULAR REASONING? Ingon man gud ka inyo source is God---unsay proof nimo ani? O nara ha.

sir nihatag ko og evidence pero imo ra mang gi ignore nya inig balik nimo og tobag imo gihapon ipa ngutana kong asa among evidence, so that made me think nga basin you were asking for a proof. dili evidence.

ok good. there is no proof sir karon nga time kay ang proof came here 2,000 years ago in the person of Jesus Christ. but we can show evidences. we cannot ask for proof sir kay its illogical, kay by definition God is immaterial og wa pay gadget nga maka detect sa iyang presence.

let me illustrate sir. kanusa ra na dsicover ang atom? sa wa pa na discover ang atom nagpasabot ba nga walay atom? of course not. naa nay atom ato but wa pa lang ma discover until ni abot ang technology. here is a good link sir...Answers.com - Who discovered the atom

it started as a speculation pero kadugayan na discover ra jud og na proven sa science nga tinood jud ang atom.

same thing sa Ginoo sir, there are evidences nga naay Ginoo but wa pa ang technology para ma detect nato siya.

But it doesn't mean nga walay Ginoo kay bisan sa korte sir bisan walay proof but strong ang Evidence ma gamit gihapon ang evidence to prove something as true.

[nowpress*]

based on my own understanding, science peeps, you're free to correct my idea.

our planet lies in the goldilocks zone in our solar system. that's the habitable zone. we live in a planet where the temperature doesn't reach boiling point, and doesn't reach the extreme cold temperatures, just enough for species to exist.

our planet has the right elements for life to exist. every living specie has DNA.

now theists would ask, who designed the DNA? if a program was designed by a programmer, sure thing the DNA should have a designer, and theists call this designer as God!

i read on some sources that with the proper elements in the atmosphere, the DNA "coils" would bond together and life form would exist. science peeps, you can add more data or you can object about this but that's what i read.

now from a single bacteria to an advanced life form that's what you call abiogenesis. (am i right?) i'm not a person who specializes in biology but at least i have a significant background about it, by reading resources.

fossils can prove there was evolution through the concertive efforts of the brightest paleontologists. and evolution is indeed a fact now.

sir/mam i was asking for a proof.

[florida.blanca]

sir/mam i was asking for a proof.

unsa pa man d.i nang akong gipangtype diha? di pa ba na proof?

sabta palihug! gi-imply nako ang DNA

[pinoy_09]

sir/mam i was asking for a proof.

He said it.

Fossils.

Or are you asking for "evidence"?

[pinoy_09]

ok good. there is no proof sir karon nga time kay ang proof came here 2,000 years ago in the person of Jesus Christ. but we can show evidences. we cannot ask for proof sir kay its illogical, kay by definition God is immaterial og wa pay gadget nga maka detect sa iyang presence.

Huh? There are evidences nga naay Ginoo? Asa'y evidence kato imong tubag nako nga "the air we breathe" lol that's not enough evidence, sir.

Ok. Since there is no proof, then there is no reason to say that this phrase "the source is God" is true. You are employing this:

God of the gaps - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[SioDenz]

since atheists are fond of asking for a proof, mangayo pod ko og proof. asa ang proof let's say nga ang osa ka bacteria nahimong fish then nahimong amphibian then nahimong reptiles then nahimong Birds.

Science is still looking for the Missing links bro, and based on the Atheist way of thinking Since No physical Evidence then It Did Not Exist.

[SioDenz]

natural process

You mean randomly?

[nowpress*]

unsa pa man d.i nang akong gipangtype diha? di pa ba na proof?

sabta palihug! gi-imply nako ang DNA

we discussed earlier kong onsay pasabot sa proof. the best thing that you can do is to give me a record or a science experiment nga naka pakita nga ang osa ka bacteria nahimo og fish, that's proof mam/sir.

He said it.

Fossils.

Or are you asking for "evidence"?

fossils are not proof for evolution. it could be just bones and stones. pero it can be a proof of ancient people and creatures but not for evolution.

[SioDenz]

fossils can prove there was evolution through the concertive efforts of the brightest paleontologists. and evolution is indeed a fact now.

Does the fossils proving that humans came from Apes already discovered? if so, why man wala pa nahimung Law ang Theory of evolution? can you give us some links that the Theory of Evolution is already a fact therefore accepted by the Whole scientific community around the world? wheres the Proof?

[nowpress*]

Science is still looking for the Missing links bro, and based on the Atheist way of thinking Since No physical Evidence then It Did Not Exist.

mao nay gi ingon bro nga ang missing link until now missing gihapon.