Questions for the Atheists

[nowpress*]

---

wa na giliko na ang discussion sa "grammar" morag wa nay matobag nga tarong.

[pinoy_09]

nya ang problema anang mag inglis inglis ka nga bisaya kang dako is di gyud na nimo ma articulate pag ayo kong onsay gosto nimo ipasabot kay by heart and mind nagdako man ka sa Pinas, unless sigoro kong sukad pagkatao nimo naa naka sa USA og nagdako ka using the english language.

Nya ngano big deal man kaayo nimo ang semantics? You could have just ignored it. In reality, kay puro manta mga bisaya diri, you think our readers would have noticed the difference between "proof" and "evidence"? I don't think so. Murag ikaw raman naka notice. Gawas kung majority nato diri mga native english speakers. But because you wanna feel superior, gipadako gyud nimo ang issue.

[want2binvolve]

kung walai superior nato...so kinsa mai gacreate na2? molecules? maporma lng tag kalit unya naa daun tah pangutok...unya mkalalis daun ta dri sa istorya...

[florida.blanca]

He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death or mourning or crying or pain, for the old order of things has passed away."

The crucible for silver and the furnace for gold, but the LORD tests the heart.
Proverbs 17:3

All I can say is that Atheists resembles similar to a spoiled child afraid of tests and wants a lazy life.

Never put off till tomorrow what you can do today.

I'm just wondering, kung all knowing man kaha ni inyong God, he should at least know by now kung unsa ang suffering sa mankind! Nonsense deaths, sufferings and those stuff! I mean, pila na man ka centuries nga nagpray ang humanity with those issues over and over!

Kung ganahan siya nga iwipe out ang tear and no more death he should do that by now. Ngano magset pa man siyag panahon oi para magpaabot pa nga daghang tawo ang mag-antos sa kasakit aning kalibutana. or is it, wala ra jud na siya nagexist! nga inutil ng inyong God?

Perfect man kaha siya diba?

He created us in his own image? Then how come we aren't powerful, we aren't imortal?

[pinoy_09]

well ignorante sigoro ko sa english just like sa obang kano nga na tao na sa USA but sayop gihapon ilang grammar. but ikaw ignorante pod ka sa pag gamit sa word nga proof og evidence.

di jud ko ma bother ana sir anang grammar. hahaha.

O lagi. You're smarter na.

[nowpress*]

Nya ngano big deal man kaayo nimo ang semantics? You could have just ignored it. In reality, kay puro manta mga bisaya diri, you think our readers would have noticed the difference between "proof" and "evidence"? I don't think so. Gawas kung majority nato diri mga native english speakers. But because you wanna feel superior, gipadako gyud nimo ang issue.

imo man ng interpretation nga big deal kaayo nako ang semantics. makasabot pod ko kong onsa ng proof og evidence sir oi, altho di perfect akong grammart pero kasabot ko kong onsa na.

just to clarify what you mean, mao ra jud ang reason. kay sige ka og used sa word nga evidence nya inig hatag nako og evidence mobalik pod ka og ingon nga show me your evidence, mao ng naka huna huna ko nga basin you were asking for a proof, that's why i told you to use the right term.

[florida.blanca]

kung walai superior nato...so kinsa mai gacreate na2? molecules? maporma lng tag kalit unya naa daun tah pangutok...unya mkalalis daun ta dri sa istorya...

natural process

[pinoy_09]

imo man ng interpretation nga big deal kaayo nako ang semantics. makasabot pod ko kong onsa ng proof og evidence sir oi, altho di perfect akong grammart pero kasabot ko kong onsa na.

just to clarify what you mean, mao ra jud ang reason. kay sige ka og used sa word nga evidence nya inig hatag nako og evidence mobalik pod ka og ingon nga show me your evidence, mao ng naka huna huna ko nga basin you were asking for a proof, that's why i told you to use the right term.

Wa man siguro ko'y gi mention nga "proof" sa akong first nga reply nimo sa "logic" topic. Coz personally, I prefer the word "evidence".

So kung ni ana ko nga I was asking for "proof", would that have made your answer different? Or balik lang gihapon mo sa CIRCULAR REASONING? Ingon man gud ka inyo source is God---unsay proof nimo ani? O nara ha.

[nowpress*]

natural process

since atheists are fond of asking for a proof, mangayo pod ko og proof. asa ang proof let's say nga ang osa ka bacteria nahimong fish then nahimong amphibian then nahimong reptiles then nahimong Birds.

[florida.blanca]

since atheists are fond of asking for a proof, mangayo pod ko og proof. asa ang proof let's say nga ang osa ka bacteria nahimong fish then nahimong amphibian then nahimong reptiles then nahimong Birds.

based on my own understanding, science peeps, you're free to correct my idea.

our planet lies in the goldilocks zone in our solar system. that's the habitable zone. we live in a planet where the temperature doesn't reach boiling point, and doesn't reach the extreme cold temperatures, just enough for species to exist.

our planet has the right elements for life to exist. every living specie has DNA.

now theists would ask, who designed the DNA? if a program was designed by a programmer, sure thing the DNA should have a designer, and theists call this designer as God!

i read on some sources that with the proper elements in the atmosphere, the DNA "coils" would bond together and life form would exist. science peeps, you can add more data or you can object about this but that's what i read.

now from a single bacteria to an advanced life form that's what you call abiogenesis. (am i right?) i'm not a person who specializes in biology but at least i have a significant background about it, by reading resources.

fossils can prove there was evolution through the concertive efforts of the brightest paleontologists. and evolution is indeed a fact now.