
Originally Posted by
nowpress*
to avoid confusion you have to used the right term and bright people used those terms accurately.
i only ask you to defined your terms carefully, that's all, but instead of complying imo pa gyud barogan.
lisod man pod kaayo if you say give me evidence for god but imong pasabot really is physical link? so to avoid confusion I asked you to use proof kay mas masabtan na siya kong onsay imong gi pangayo.
now if you say give me evidence for god and you mean any evidence that requires no physical link then you are right in using the term.
reading how you structured your arguments, it shows that you are asking for physical evidence so better use the word proof. simple ra kaayo akong hangyo pero imo pa gyud i losot. that wont work bai.
this is not about feeling good oi, basin ikaw mao ng nakasulti ka ana. this is about finding what is true or not.
Are you done?
If you keep debating me on semantics, I might as well debate you on your grammatical structure, coz obviously daghan kag flaw ana nga part. But nah, I won't do that, because I don't wanna sound "superior" to others.