Questions for the Atheists

[pinoy_09]

---

If you believe in a God, everything becomes evidence of His existence.

If you don't believe in a God, everything becomes evidence of his non existence.

Fair enough.

[pinoy_09]

Evidence man kaha sir? not proof ha? kay there is a big difference between these two.

wa man nako na toyok toyoka sir. mora ra gud ana sir, kita ka og makina it's against logic kog mosolti ka nga kin nga makina was created by chemicals w/o any intelligence OR nitunga ra man ni og kalit. you can't say that. The best and most logical to say is there is a creator or an engineer nga nagbohat ani nga makina. so katong makina sir evidence na siya nga naay engineer. although wa ta kita sa gahimo but our logic will tell us nga naay creator.

You can't say the same with the universe.

btw, proof and evidence are essentially the same.

[Soul Doctor]

Imagine Manny Pacquiao as an atheist.

Do you think we could be proud of Him as Filipinos?

[nowpress*]

You can't say the same with the universe.

btw, proof and evidence are essentially the same.

mas convincing evidence hinoon ang universe sir. The Universe requires super intelligence hehe. para ma create.

no sir they are not the same. although both are looking for a link pero di na siya pareho sir. Evidence can be direct and indirect, while proof dapat direct jud like fingerprints, DNA, I.D, videos n audios.

[nowpress*]

Imagine Manny Pacquiao as an atheist.

Do you think we could be proud of Him as Filipinos?

i wonder onsay reaction sa mga atheists sir inig kita nila ni Manny making the sign of the cross. I'm sure kita ni sila ni Manny doing it.

[SioDenz]

Questions for Atheists:
-Where Did humans came from? what is our origin? or who created us?
-What is your purpose here on earth facing all these problems we have here?
-What is the basis of your morality?
-And What will happen to you after you die?

[pinoy_09]

mas convincing evidence hinoon ang universe sir. The Universe requires super intelligence hehe. para ma create.

no sir they are not the same. although both are looking for a link pero di na siya pareho sir. Evidence can be direct and indirect, while proof dapat direct jud like fingerprints, DNA, I.D, videos n audios.

Educate me.

Evidence is a synonym of proof. In atheist lingo, both are interchangeable.

i wonder onsay reaction sa mga atheists sir inig kita nila ni Manny making the sign of the cross. I'm sure kita ni sila ni Manny doing it.

I personally don't care. I don't know about the other atheist/agnostics in this thread. Kusug raba kaayo mu mu-generalize.

[nowpress*]

Educate me.

Evidence is a synonym of proof. In atheist lingo, both are interchangeable.



I personally don't care. I don't know about the other atheist/agnostics in this thread. Kusug raba kaayo mu mu-generalize.

i already posted the difference. but we have to be specific, you cannot use one term to mean the other.

if you ask for evidence daghan pasabot ana. but if you ask for proof...osa ray pasabot ana. So my advice para you won't sound ignorant. defined your terms well and I suggest you used the word "proof" if you mean physical link and used the word "evidence" if you mean categories that does not require physical evidence.


ondang na anang imong mga palosot sir wa tay makuha ana. it cannot prove nga wise ka o bright ka. get straight to the issue.

[pinoy_09]

i already posted the difference. but we have to be specific, you cannot use one term to mean the other.

if you ask for evidence daghan pasabot ana. but if you ask for proof...osa ray pasabot ana. So my advice para you might not sound ignorant. defined your terms well and I suggest you used the word "proof" if you mean physical link and used the word "evidence" if you mean categories that does not require physical evidence.


ondang na anang imong mga palosot sir wa tay makuha ana. it cannot prove nga wise ka o bright ka. get straight to the issue.

What's wrong with interchanging proof and evidence? These are synonyms. Brayt man kaha ka, just use your common sense.

Dude, cut me some slack. Don't complicate the matter so you sound "superior" than me. Padak-on pa gyud ang issue para ingnon kunohay...

Quit debating me on semantics. It's not gonna do us any good other than feeling good about yourself.

[nowpress*]

What's wrong with interchanging proof and evidence? These are synonyms. Brayt man kaha ka, just use your common sense.

Dude, cut me some slack. Don't complicate the matter so you sound "superior" than me. Padak-on pa gyud ang issue para ingnon kunohay...

Quit debating me on semantics. It's not gonna do us any good other than feeling good about yourself.

to avoid confusion you have to used the right term and bright people used those terms accurately.

i only ask you to defined your terms carefully, that's all, but instead of complying imo pa gyud barogan.

lisod man pod kaayo if you say give me evidence for god but imong pasabot really is physical link? so to avoid confusion I asked you to use proof kay mas masabtan na siya kong onsay imong gi pangayo.

now if you say give me evidence for god and you mean any evidence that requires no physical link then you are right in using the term.

reading how you structured your arguments, it shows that you are asking for physical evidence so better use the word proof. simple ra kaayo akong hangyo pero imo pa gyud i losot. that wont work bai.

this is not about feeling good oi, basin ikaw mao ng nakasulti ka ana. this is about finding what is true or not.