Questions for the Atheists

[tuffie09]

---

@tuffie

Bai tuffie kung ikaw natawo sa panahon sa Nazi, unsaon man nimo pag pugong ang genocide nga wala may absolute supreme law giver nga mo dumili sa pinaka heinous crime sa humanity? di ba ang athiesm walay gibasehan nga susama sa Christianity nga tataw o klaro ayo ang pag dumili sa pag patay labi na nasulat sa bible? di ba nag base ra man ang morality sa social mores , unya kay kung pananglitan apil ka sa social pressure sa pagpatay sa Jews unsaon man nimo pag pugong ang genocide nga na define man nimo ang morality sa majority (social mores) sa nag tuo nga genocide sakto?

tagai kuno ko sa imong maayong huna huna..

Hitler was raised by a roman catholic parents. He was also raised to hate jews and such.

According to historian Bradley F. Smith, Hitler's father Alois, though nominally a Catholic, was somewhat religiously skeptical, while his mother Klara was a practicing Catholic. At the Benedictine monastery school which Hitler attended for one school year as a child (1897–189, Hitler became top of his class, receiving 12 1's, the highest grade, in the final quarter. He also sang in the choir at the monastery. According to historian Michael Rissmann, young Hitler was influenced in school by Pan-Germanism and began to reject the Catholic Church, receiving Confirmation only unwillingly. A boyhood friend reports that after Hitler had left home, he never again attended a Catholic Mass or received the Church's Sacraments.[4] Georg Ritter von Schönerer's writings and the written legacy of his Pan-German Away from Rome! movement, which agitated against the Catholic Church at the end of the 19th century, may have influenced the young Hitler.

My other thought is, nganu pugngan man nako kung ingon ana sila the way mo think? In that time being the world is full of hatred, chaos and straight kill talks.

Its like the time when people thought that the "earth was flat" , mao ni time na gihimo ang bible. You just cant justify things right now because they did stuff like that before, that's way too primitive way of thinking sir. Its a total bullcrap to think that earth is flat now when its proven by science that its not.

[ketllac]

@tuffie

kung ibalanse nato sir si Pius XII, Pope from 1939 to 1958, “rescued more Jews than all the Allies combined.”

[ketllac]

@tuffie

sa imo gi post sir pwede sad nato ibalanse nga ang simbahan maoy sinugdanan sa ubang science discoveries.
like ni Mendel usa ka catholic monk nga founder sa Modern genetics ug big bang theory from Monsignor Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître. Kung primitive paminawon ang simbahan ngano ang proponent sa state atheism primitive man sad like sa Genocide?

Kini ba nag pasabot nga dilikado ang atheism nga pangutok because we can correlate ang grabe nga atrocities?

[want2binvolve]

uhmm naa koi question, ako sad giask ako mga bro ani, d mn cla mutubag...
if ever an atheist matrap in some hopeless situation... na kabaw mo na wa nadyui bsan unsang tao na mkatabang ug wa pud cyai mabuhat,.. like maaccident sa dangerous deserted area (bsag inagta, if ever lng)... mkatawag mo ug Ginoo, even if dli mo mutuo, just having a knowledge of God?

[pinoy_09]

In this sentence: It lacks a plausible natural explanation (hence the word "immaterial"), it does.

Hence means for this reason. I-substitute nato na sa imong original statement aron imong ma-klaro: It lacks a plausible natural explanation (for this reason it is immaterial) .

What's the big deal?

Cge ato nalang dawaton napud nga sakto ka. Granting nga ni ingon gyud ko (sa imong pagsabot) nga "immaterial is lacking a plausible explanation". Sakto gihapon ko, given that the definition of immaterial is:

Immaterial - Spiritual, rather than physical

Again, can you give a plausible natural explanation to something IMMATERIAL? You cannot, right? So sakto gyud lagi gihapon ko.

You should ask that question to yourself and to your fellow atheists

Ikaw man ako gipangutana, di man ang atheists. Gipangutana tika nya ipasa diay nimo balik nako?

So, balik ta sa akong pangutana.

Kaning inyong assumption nga: THE ONLY way to recognize the TRUTH is through LOGIC

Unsa man pud ang plausible natural proof ana? Duna na bay scientific experiment nga makapamatuod anang maong assumption? Kun wala, dili kaha ang basis sa inyong pagtoo is the logic of the gaps?Tubaga, ha. Ayaw og likay2x.

I've already given my own answer in the previous pages. Kung dika satisfied, that's not my problem anymore. Why don't you ask the other atheists/agnostics this question, basin pa diay maka enlighten sila nimo.

[Saga]

I have a question sa mga resident ATHEIST nato if ever we have some or kadtong inclined to be ATHEIST gyud sila mapa soft or hard .

IF EVER YOU GUYS DECIDE TO BECOME THEIST , WHICH GOD WOULD YOU BELIEVE AND RECOGNIZE ? WHY ?

Thank you daan if mo answer mo and please , ayaw saguli ug yagaw if di kamo ang mo answer .

i have become an atheist not by choice but by knowledge learned and an open mind understanding of things around us... to answer the question which god i will believe and recognize... none...... so far none of them was able to provide the knowledge to persuade me to take side..

[pinoy_09]

I have a question sa mga resident ATHEIST nato if ever we have some or kadtong inclined to be ATHEIST gyud sila mapa soft or hard .

IF EVER YOU GUYS DECIDE TO BECOME THEIST , WHICH GOD WOULD YOU BELIEVE AND RECOGNIZE ? WHY ?

Thank you daan if mo answer mo and please , ayaw saguli ug yagaw if di kamo ang mo answer .

Are you asking this question with the assumption that we get to choose Gods from the different religions? Or we get to "create" our own "GOD"? Either way, I would recognize a God who lacks the negative attributes of the God described in the Old Testament.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

@ SAGA .... medyo maypagka broad ang question and you answered with an obvious NO . Does that constitute that you are PERFECT ? Just wondering . From your statement , you seem to know everything because none of these so called gods provided knowledge to you . Pero medyo contradicting noh ? You are still in search of answers but you refuse to look for it .

@ PINOY09 .... any god . Just like the answer of TUFFIE which came with an explanation of the WHY question . It could be BUDDHA , the ALLAH , GREEK GODS , etc . Its a question that holds gravity to the issue since we all know that there a couple types of atheist , the one who denies its its existence and the one who doesnt acknowledge its existence . But given the chance na mo tuo ka ug SUPREME BEING , that is my question . WHO WOULD THAT BE AND WHY .

[WordofGod]

kapoy na kayo nang mga garbo sa atheists bro...mura jud ug unsa na kadako sa ilang knowledge about the universe. youre just fooling yourself! try to see those who are from that stance and came to realize the reality of God's existence.

nahabilin are just being arrogant...

YouTube - ‪Antony Flew's conversion to theism‬‏
YouTube - ‪Ravi Zacharias Answers Atheists Part 1‬‏
YouTube - ‪C.S Lewis - Mere Christianity (Part 1)‬‏

why christianity makes sense?
YouTube - ‪N.T. Wright - Simply Christian (Part 1)‬‏

[WordofGod]

wala pa gani mo makabuhat ug inyong libro.. try to consider these brilliant minded atheists nga naka amgo na sa ilang kaugalingon?

YouTube - ‪C S Lewis and Conversion‬‏