Do you believe in God? If so/if no, WHY?

[KuLaSa]

---

i am not really sure if you really are ignorant or just plain dishonest.

try scrolling back on this thread please...i quoted Magellan...you obviously don't know anything about it...lack of knowledge or unawareness of something? does that ring a bell? now, how else will you let me describe that? and puhleaase, get over it...obviously you do not have anything smart to say...so beat it.

ig·no·rance [ Ã*gnərəns ]

noun

1. lack of knowledge: lack of knowledge or education


2. unawareness: unawareness of something, often of something important

[tolstoi]

i agree with u bout my ignorance on the magellan's?? quote..and it is because of the fact that im no atheist who uses every damned quotes in the world just to discredit a religion...and as what VisualC# pointed and i also reiterates here that you are NO-SMARTER than a goat since u are the one who starts using insulting words...so therefore i can conclude here that you are the LEGALLY...

dumby

*a person who is the opposite of smart*

[last post nalang ni nako diri na thread..so peace out..matiguwang ta ani sayo dah..

[PissKhanXXX]

i have no doubts about God and His existence!

[KuLaSa]

My first post on this thread is my answer to the question "Do you believe in God"…was it up for argument? Not really but you picked it up. Now, if it's a personal conviction and you think it's to discredit your religion…that is your freakin' problem, not mine. You may have not thrown the first "insulting" remark but you obviously insinuated it…sorry, I don't know how else to describe your lack of knowledge other than to use the term "ignorant".

Obviously, you have never heard the phrase "ignorance is bliss" either…no wonder you took it personally.

Where Ignorance is Bliss,
Tis folly to be wise,
It's better to be ignorant like me . . .

The trial production was transmitted on 1 April 1946

[Matiguwang gyud ka'g ahat…liman ka, nagsige ra diay kag atang nus-a ko mo balik diri? Sorry to keep you awake at night…hehehe!]

Outta here. There's no argument to be won here.

[giver_bert]

OT: Hmmm... you don't have to speak out of your lungs for somebody/something that you don't believe in... it's a waste of time and effort... not unless if subconsciously you still do, personally i find it tantamount to convincing yourself indirectly

first of all, i assume your comment is from my post, otherwise i aplogize for barking at the wrong tree. now, read the thread where i started posting before you make an unsolicited comment...

second of all, speak for yourself (re: subconscious crap...mkay?)

hhhmmm... i'd like to set the record straight that i'm stressing my opinion generally and i don't have any intentions at attacking somebody else's posts, not unless if i feel the urge at making one, which in this case i think i have to...

Me.. i believe in Him, and i don't give a damn if others won't.. it's their right - freewill...

making this comment...i think you sure give a damn! but then again, you are entitled to your own "beliefs" and so am I.

namaste!

you're way too assuming kulasa... and if you internalize my post.. it's obvioiusly a clear statement that i don't have any intentions at letting others swallow what i chose to believed in and that i respect other peoples contention regarding the matter-that is why we have these thingies like forums as an avenue for us to hear each others insights on a cetrain matter... let's not put words on other peoples mouth.. this is basically just a healthy discussion (as what i see it to be as such since then) and i apologize but i don't have any intention at keeping up at your level right now..

now let's go back to the topic... and again avoid hitting below the belt..

[KuLaSa]

you're way too assuming kulasa... and if you internalize my post.. it's obvioiusly a clear statement that i don't have any intentions at letting others swallow what i chose to believed in and that i respect other peoples contention regarding the matter-that is why we have these thingies like forums as an avenue for us to hear each others insights on a cetrain matter... let's not put words on other peoples mouth.. this is basically just a healthy discussion (as what i see it to be as such since then) and i apologize but i don't have any intention at keeping up at your level right now..

now let's go back to the topic... and again avoid hitting below the belt..

am i assuming or are you? did i put words into your mouth? i'm sorry...which part...and btw, why would i be interested in YOU and whatever's below your belt...i already said my piece...

let's skim through this thread, shall we?...page 3...sept 22 and sept 27...you already posted your stance on this topic, right?

oh no...wait...you came back right after a few exchange of postings between me and tolstoi on nov. 7...with an "OT: you don't have to speak out of your lungs for somebody/something that you don't believe in... blah blah blah"...and that was supposedly a "general" opinion on the topic you already had an opinion on? and may i ask what is your definition of "speaking out of your lungs" in a discussion board? i'm sorry, please enlighten me.

if you TRULY don't give a damn, why bother making a general comment on those who doesn't believe in your god? i mean, really.

hhhmmm... i'd like to set the record straight that i'm stressing my opinion generally and i don't have any intentions at attacking somebody else's posts, not unless if i feel the urge at making one, which in this case i think i have to...

[giver_bert]

am i assuming or are you? did i put words into your mouth? i'm sorry...which part...and btw, why would i be interested in YOU and whatever's below your belt...i already said my piece...

first of all, i assume your comment is from my post

Hope this is good enough to enlighten you... it's your words against your words

[KuLaSa]

of course...but next time you quote me...please don't delete the most important part...

first of all, i assume your comment is from my post, [size=14px]otherwise i aplogize for barking at the wrong tree[/size]. now, read the thread where i started posting before you make an unsolicited comment...

now, was that REALLY a general opinion? your THIRD "opinion" on this thread...no one argued your "opinion" since Sept. 27, right? i ain't gullible.

[giver_bert]

if you are sincere with you're apology then i'll take it However, it doesn't negate the fact that you were assuming in the first place, right? so there aint any question about it also..

if you TRULY don't give a damn, why bother making a general comment on those who doesn't believe in your god? i mean, really.

I feel the need at stressing further cause it seems there has been a misunderstanding with my post.. again i said it on a general context and i hope you agree with it, if not then i'll respect it.. why spend a great deal of effort for something that we don’t believe in the first place? (this doesn't apply only to our beliefs)

and one more thing.. nobody's preventing you from posting over and over... what's prohibited i guess are using abrasive words to fellow istoryans..

[KuLaSa]

asuming or not, your post obviously was not in a general context. like i said, it was your third post to this thread and surely it was not out of the blue. at least be honest with that.

like i have suggested earlier, please read the start of my postings in this thread to get a better understanding of where i'm coming from. as you can see, i was simply rebutting tolstoi's attack on my opinion. did i question other people's answers as to their "beliefs" and what not on this thread?

i'm sorry if the the word "IGNORANT, IGNORANCE, ignoy" is too much to swallow for some posters here but i can't think of any other word to describe: lack of knowledge or unawareness of something. do you?

peace!