again, you don't have to agree with me. first thing you attack is my handle? and that helps prove your point, right?
i read your post, didn't attack you personally...i wrote what i think...
almost 50/50...yep, divided.
one CUNTry two moralities:
... silly me -- one's greatest strength is one's greatest weakness... so I must abandon the solace of thinking my amiga from flourduh, texsex, etc. and the heehaws benighted, uneducated and cognitively impaired... and their omnipotent dubya the saviour...
... but i refuse to think them more moral.
... there are as many moral values at stake in opposing the slaughter of innocent Iraqi children as there are in opposing the abortion of innocent unborn children... as much moral sensitivity in defending the world's wilderness from exploitation as in defending our ... er ... homeland security... and as much moral courage in supporting the rights of people of all sexual orientations as in supporting traditional marriage....
... two different moralities... one with republicunts to be of higher value... and so they say... the democrats are too complex for the majority of bible belt to even understand...
...while significant "losers" like moi and half of america despise this certainty as ignorance, bigotry and cruelty...
... what i meant may demand more intelligence but i'm sure you can muster...
peace!