Sigma 70-200mm vs Tamron 70-200mm F2.8

[wildfuzz]

---

thanks bro yeah thats why i was confused if 18-250 is capable of doing 70-200 i was wondering why the size of 70-200 is bigger and more expensive than 18-250wen 18-250 i has greater focal length or distance correct me if im wrong.

because 18-250mm is 3.5f-5.6f im not mistaken dn ang 70-200mm is 2.8f..mas dako cya ug glass bro mao mas dako ang size sa mga 70-200mm..bsta pang prof or nindot na mga lens sir 2.8f fix ila aperture.....

[vanix09]

true true..

[Lao]

@azinec : thanks for that

@wildfuzz: actually its 6.3 around 250 T_T now i understand the reason behind its size and price its because of the fixed f2.8 in whatever range you are into. thank you anyway i hope i can have such lens someday its because of the reviews thats why i bought this 18-250 actually

[wildfuzz]

@azinec : thanks for that

@wildfuzz: actually its 6.3 around 250 T_T now i understand the reason behind its size and price its because of the fixed f2.8 in whatever range you are into. thank you anyway i hope i can have such lens someday its because of the reviews thats why i bought this 18-250 actually

ahh ok..so 3.5-6.3f.....well its up to you bro...hehehe.enjoy ur lens...atlist u get d most versatile all around lens..dha nmu makita asa jd imu gusto na field in photography,portrait or landscape etc..