Everything about : RH Bill ( Reproductive Health Bill)

[em_b]

OFF TOPIC.

Romeojin, you have a lot of catching up to do. Taas taas na ang mga comments. hehehehehehe. Its amazing, dati, tag 2 pages per day ra man ang traffic diri. Karun, 2 pages in less than an hour!

[kiybordwaryur]

in my understanding, it is already the scope of FDA to determine what is abortificient or not. per my understanding, pills as of now does not fall in the category of abortificient. just the same, this is to give informed choices. you can skip the pills if you want to. or other method you categorized as abortificient. apil man sad ang pagtudlo sa rhythm method.

FDA?
mao gani angay ni babagan nga bill

why? pwde ra nila ingon na "its in RH Bill context"
"modern"

pag ma label na nga "modern method" sayun ra na nila i justify!

pwde ra nila i cover-up ang mga abortifacient coz its a "modern method"

gets mo?


daghan red tape.. ug corruption sa govt.. mapun-an na pod!

[digitalsuperman]

nice au nga article regarding pacman supporting the RH Bill.

The Pacman’s failed fight

its amazing to know nga mostly sa mga reklamador sa RH Bill kay mga lalake, sama sa mga pari nga walay mga asawa ug anak,when in fact health man sa mga women ang gi discuss ani.

[kiybordwaryur]

nice au nga article regarding pacman supporting the RH Bill.

The Pacman’s failed fight

kani may sakto..

sakspan!

Boxing champ Pacquiao uncovers Lagman's misleading claims of amended provisions | CBCP News


Knockout!

[em_b]

FDA?
mao gani angay ni babagan nga bill

why? pwde ra nila ingon na "its in RH Bill context"
"modern"

pag ma label na nga "modern method" sayun ra na nila i justify!

pwde ra nila i cover-up ang mga abortifacient coz its a "modern method"

gets mo?


daghan red tape.. ug corruption sa govt.. mapun-an na pod!

objectin your honor. misleading. hehehehehe. this will fall under the category of paranoia.

[Romeojin]

I correct ang mga defect sa RH bill, kung tinuod nga defective. It is better to have soemthing to do with it than not.

mao lagi ang point pud nako, i correct sa tanan wherein majority will meet gyud at some point. Himuon man dayon lagi nila ug law before sila moreklamo

One sided man gyud ning mga pro puro ra sa good side gi concentrate way analysis.
Im glad they took off that "employers responsibility side". There are some more things needs to be iron out.

[jumper_stage]

Save life, Save sperm. We're not criminal.

[kiybordwaryur]

objectin your honor. misleading. hehehehehe. this will fall under the category of paranoia.

well.. ang mag likay sa truth ug
di mu answer

guilty..

ooppsss..

[em_b]

kani may sakto..

sakspan!

Boxing champ Pacquiao uncovers Lagman's misleading claims of amended provisions | CBCP News


Knockout!

From a reliable source. Pro Life will be better off without Pacquiao, I think.

Seares: Manny as anti-RH debater Sunstar, May 20, 2011

MANNY Pacquiao was clobbered in the House session the other day when he interpellated Edcel Lagman, major proponent of the reproductive health (RH) bill.

And it was duller than boxing champ Pacquiao's recent fight with Shane Mosley: such a "yawner" that it sent most of their colleagues out of the House session hall.


There was some laughter and snickering, prompted by Manny's feeble jabs at the bill's defects.



He must know how lopsided the Pacquiao-Lagman skirmish would be. A spoof in the blog "Professional Heckler" had this answer from the boxing champion when told by Kris Aquino that Sen. Miriam Santiago would face him in the ring if necessary: "Ok lang, 'wag lang mag-Inglisan. Baka ma-knockout tayo doon. He-he."

Other zany Q&As in the mock interview:

Kris--Senator Santiago tells you to stick to boxing and not meddle in the RH bill issue.

Manny--I'm not in the middle. Sa pagitan lang ako, nakinig.

Kris--What do you think of *** education?

Manny--I don't think of *** education.

Kris--Do you use condoms?

Manny--No. Walang fillings.

If Manny could be half that funny, he'd be as entertaining as a late-night show comic.

But he couldn't be in a real debate.

And a one-on-one parliamentary tussle with a veteran legislator? Foolhardy at best, stupid at worst.

Poster boy

Pacquiao may help the anti-RH bill cause by serving as its poster boy but he can't be its debater.

The bishops and others in the anti-RH camp may have to review the wisdom of having Manny slug it out with veteran parliamentarians.

[Romeojin]

Paapila ko dri bi. I am a PRO!

Simple logic tells us that we need population control as there is already so much demand for meager resources. And we also need human development and empowerment. The bill potentially opens opportunity to address those needs.

The bill had no population control measure even the authors and co-authors of the bill had been vocal about it. You dont need simple logic just read the bill Ayaw pailad sa uban