Yes
No
the discussion seems to be the same with the other thread. i am marking this for merging later.
“What we call chaos is just patterns we haven't recognized. What we call random is just patterns we cant decipher. What we can't understand we call nonsense. What we can't read we call gibberish.” - Chuck Palahniuk
atong dunganan ug basa para naa sense ato comment ani nga thread.
15th Congress - House Bill 4244 (full text, final consolidated RH bill, HB 4244)
agree.
even the main author of the bill had said...
RH proponents push for bill’s passage in House plenary | Pnoy sa Palasyo“The RH bill is rights-based, and central to the measure is freedom of informed choice. Consistent with freedom of choice, this bill has no specific demographic targets. It is not a population control measure," Lagman said during his sponsorship speech on Tuesday afternoon.
so all talks of population is crap![]()
hoi, mg-isip ka nga. population control will help gyud ka progress kay unsaon pg-asinso sa mga pobre kung daghan cla gipakaon. ang kwarta para sa education sa anak, papunta sa pagkaon sa uban pang anak.
anti-RH bill ka, unsa mn lain nimo solution kuno beh. ikaw pakaon anang mga bata naa sa street na d mbuhi sa ilang parents kay 5 cla kabuok. dili ba poverty tawag ana.
Kasabot man ko sa imong point na pandemic na gyud ang PMS now the question is. IF we had RH bill now, what stopping us from prohibiting teens not to engage *** when the bill state that no discrimination everyone have RH rights? if contraceptives is readily accessible, PMS will be much more pandemic.
Paki point kuno which part did i said na tudluan ug *** ang mga student with *** ed class ? pareho man mo ni bronson. you putting words on my mouth if you manage to come up with that conclusion ikaw gyud ang T-A-N-G-A.
gun analogy lol ayaw ko ingna tagaan nimo condom/rh services mga teens they will know to control themselves![]()
Good or bad kadugay na ang *** ed noh, the point is why does the RH bill give RH rights to teens, when we are telling them not to engage in *** at the early age. ngano mugamay man ang incident sa PMs when igo na lang sila mangayo ug contraceptives ? please tubaga sad ako kapila na nako ni gibalik2x.
Para mas simple... in the absence of *** education cause it is now considered to make *** education optional (di na compulsory). Why do we have to give RH rights to teens, when we are telling them not to engage in *** ? di ba it will create mix message?
The only way to prevent PMS is to sexually oppressed them / force them to obey the NO PMS rule -- abstinence. If we give them RH rights we will not gonna prevent sexual liberation cause once the RH bill is enacted, theres no stopping it. Like you said and some other here that media play a role on sexual mentality. Teens will learn about *** from the media, porns, from other teen, etc. if they ultimately decide it, the state which guarantee RH rights to all must heed and gave then contraceptives.
Bai wa pa kagamit ug condom? lol you wont get STI if you wont have *** with people who have it, if not sure you buy your own condom
prevention is better lagi, what happen to thailand with 100% condom use program ni result to 1M+ case of HIV compare to what 7000 cases here. condom use also induced riskier *** .
watch sa GMA News Tv ang live na debate sa lower house sa RH Bill.![]()
Similar Threads |
|