conspiracy theories

[pinoy_09]

---

By the way, Doc is an inventor.

How is his being an inventor got anything to do with his "expertise" in debunking FACTS? I'm an inventor too. I invent babies.

[yokam888]

ambit ko be about aning conspiracy theories, particularly sa wtc towers

on his campaign to becoming president, 1 sa plataporma ni george w. bush is to "increase the nation's defense budget" and if im not wrong, kini gyud ang iyahang priority.

his campaign gave me some things to think about, kay murag hapsay man ang US kadtong si bill clinton pa ang presidente but all of a sudden, bush's campaign was like the US was still in a cold war with the russians.

then we all know that bush won in 2001, then came 9/11 and after that, US congress approved and gave the defense budget a huge chunk of $$$.

my conspiracy theory = dili ba kaha gituyo lang tong 9/11 para lang maka kwarta? as we all know, war is big business.

naa pa diay hehe, ngano man nga ang iraq dayon ang gi assault sa US nga si bin laden kay naa man kaha sa afghanistan? isnt it because iraq is an oil rich country while afghanistan got nothing but poppies?

i know i know kay gidudahan lagi sa US nga naay WMD's ang iraq but to this day, no WMD's were found in that country... unya karon sige ug testing ning north korea sa ilahang mga nuclear weapons wala man lagi gibuhat ang US? puro lang sila sanctions ^_^

as ive said, ambit lang ko ha... but dont take me seriously... lingaw2 lang ni akoa

[pinoy_09]

If I was giving wrong informations, people would not like it, would they?
I did not see any "like" sa imong posts. Why is that?

You think Filipinos are stupid?
You think they can not think for themselves?
You think whatever I say here could change their understanding of the situation?
You think Filipinos do not know the difference between a controlled demolition from a structural collapse?
You are giving me too much credit pinoy_09.


I am against ignorance because it has its costs.
The war in Iraq is the cost of ignorance.

lol one good example of taking things out of context. Good job

You know, I think this "LIKE" thingy is overrated. I don't measure a good discussion or post by the amount of LIKES it receives, doc. That is too shallow. Come on, doc, you can do better than THAT.

And yeah, you have one HUGE fan by the name of THE SKULLS.

[THE SKULLS]

How is his being an inventor got anything to do with his "expertise" in debunking FACTS? I'm an inventor too. I invent babies.

Then make a patent on how you make babies by your own.

[THE SKULLS]

you're not watching the youtube videos.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

it's up to you. I believed what I saw in youtube.

Nobody is holding you to believe in what you see , at least in YOUTUBE .

same with news. cover ups. and other propagandas.

These so called COVER UPS are just mere creations of CONSPIRACY THEORIST , of course as what I have said earlier , inclined jud mo because it favors your opinion .

You're being conventional about smelling. hehehe. How about smelling it in a gracious way? Bon Apetit.


I care to smell if it's laurel leaf or bay leaf ang gisagul sa humba spring. I cook, mao nga ana ko kasersyoso mo-utingkay kung unsay subak sa putahi. And I won't eat it if it smells like sheyt.

for you, but not for everyone. sorry for that. hey, it's not a personal issue here. i-relate sa issue sa 911 spring. I will not trust anyone who feeds me. Lies and deception maybe in there. mao nga mo-examine jud ko ana spring. examine = simhot. mao nay buot ipasabot. I don't trust anyone. Misalig ko sa ako mga senses. Mao ni ako gamiton para modetermine if angay ba, sakto o sayop.

Wrong . We are talking here about LITERAL ACTIONS . We are talking about whats in it for me and you but your previous SMELLING was directed at ug unsay SUD-AN / PAGKAON and whats in it for you .

I dont think you cook , dili man na SUBAK intawn ang LAMAS . SMELLING food by the way during cooking is different from SMELLING FOOD in the table . The latter was the issue .

All you had on your senses was SIGHT out of your YOUTUBE VIDEOS . Thats it ? And you think 9-11 is a FAKE ? Way to go CHEF !!

I'm not saying I will laugh last. But I'm sure I smile.
Again, lies and deceit are all around us. Filter out spring, it's only us, ourselves, our senses mo-determine sa sakto, angay ug sayop. olrayts..

Wrong . Maski giladlad na niom ang 5 ka senses nimo namely sight , smell , taste , feel and hear pero wala ka naka tunob mismo sa NY to see foryourself what GROUND ZERO looks like and experience also what the TWIN TOWERS look like while it was still there . A PICTURE speaks a thousand words mind you , labaw na ang VIDEO .

The real issue here ? Murag mas labaw mo ni DOK mo investigate kumpara pa sa REAL EXPERTS . Do you really think I will fall for you guys ? You guys dont know nothing . PERIOD . Thats all CONSPRIACY THEORIST are , knows nothing . Mao gani CONSPIRACY THEORY , whack , ridiculous and insane .

[pinoy_09]

Ngano naka-ingon man ka redundant pinoy_09?
ato kuno tuki-on ngano nakasulti ka ana.

re·dun·dant/riˈdəndənt/Adjective1. No longer needed or useful; superfluous.
2. (of words or data) Able to be omitted without loss of meaning or function.

---------------------------------

Fact of the matter is, you can go on babbling about your conspiracy theories but it won't change the fact that AMERICA was ATTACKED by a terrorist organization called Al-Qaeda, and there's a reason why NAVY SEALs killed Bin-Laden. It's not because Bin Laden was on the CIA paycheck, but because Bin-Laden wanted anyone liberal enough to oppose his ideals erased from this earth.

[pinoy_09]

you're not watching the youtube videos.

I really don't like watching YOUTUBE vidoes for conspiracy theories because videos can be edited to favor one's opinion in the matter. I would rather do some reading from RELIABLE websites and not rely on some material which can be easily manipulated and edited.

[pinoy_09]

Let's put something in perspective here: Right when the news flashed on CNN that planes were crashed into WTC by terrorists, everyone was glued to their TVs. Now when the Towers started to collapse, the first thing that came to mind was "Hey, no way a building could crumble on itself like that. That looks like a demolition job!".

And yes, it was clearly a demolition job. The buildings crumbled as if the entire support beams of the structure did not function like they were designed to do. Can you imagine pila ka kabilyan ug mga puthaw gigamit anang buildinga? Nya gi-compute pa gyud na dapat madaug niya ang iyang gi-alsa no matter unsa kakusog sa supertyphoons na moagi nila. I would even wager na even ang fire is already considered in the construction materials used.

Pero since nobody could pinpoint the culprits, and no one is stepping up to testify either, this is why this is still labeled as a "conspiracy" til now. Even if it was very obvious, this is all speculation because you can't prove that explosives were used because nobody is willing to step up. (Laliman pud uroy ka mo-testigo adtong mga tawhana... puro man to mga bug-at kaayo)

Pero I also believe in time someone will crack and come out of the shadows to tell us what really transpired that day.

So, there -- technically, this is subject is still a conspiracy.

This is no longer a CONSPIRACY. Gahi-a gyud ug ulo ninyo sah?

Read this. This if from the link I posted a while ago. This report/investigation was done by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). In Section 5, it states:

SECTION 5: COLLAPSE

The World Trade Center towers would likely not have collapsed under the combined effects of aircraft impact damage, and the extensive multi-floor fires if the fireproofing had not been widely dislodged by the aircraft impact. What was applied to these buildings was spray-applied fireproofing. And the use of this kind of fireproofing for the floor system, the floor trusses, was very unusual. When you heat steel up, and particularly when there's no fireproofing, the steel tends to soften, and loses strength and stiffness. It becomes very much like play dough. In addition to the columns weakening, the floors that were in the vicinity of those faces also weakened. And as a result of that, the floors sagged. And the sagging of the floors actually helped pull the external columns inward. And caused an inward bowing of the external columns. That is captured in photographs. What then happened after the inward bowing is there was a stage at which a critical amount of inward bowing took place, and the columns snapped. And essentially the columns, once they snapped, the inwardly-bowed columns suddenly sprung back and out. And once that happened, the top mass, that rigid mass of somewhere on the order of 10 to 20 floors just started moving downward. And the structure below, because of the fracturing of the columns just before it, that had snapped, was unable to withstand the energy that was released. The primary reason for the collapse was the fact that you had massive airplane damage. A massive amount of fireproofing that was dislodged, and a really huge fire, that all three combined initiated the collapse. There was no one particular event that played a more significant role. It was a combination of events that led to a general system collapse of the building.

[SPRINGFIELD_XD_40]

Ani na lang para sa mga conspiracy theorist nato . To make it easier and user friendly ...

Play mo ug CRAZY BIRDS RIO and relate the domino effect lol .