Video Card Clarification

[street_of_no_return]

---

Radeon HD5850 1GB > Radeon HD6850 1GB
Radeon HD5970 2GB > Radeon HD6970 2GB
GeForce GTX 460 1GB > GeForce GTX 465 1GB

naglibog ko ani dah..

can someone explain this to me.?

src = https://www.istorya.net/forums/comput...ted-daily.html

[CARLOtech]

Radeon HD5850 1GB > Radeon HD6850 1GB=gipahinayan
Radeon HD5970 2GB > Radeon HD6970 2GB=mas kusug pa ang 5970 overclock lang
GeForce GTX 460 1GB > GeForce GTX 465 1GB=i think not 465 but 560

amd chart:

[Sempron Guy]

HD6850 has improved tessalation but the HD5850 is faster, more less iya performance within range na sa reference HD6870. Not sure sa HD5970 vs HD6970, but I heard the latter was faster if the game is poorly programmed for a cf config. The GTX 460 is faster but remember naay tulo ka variant ang GTX 460. So nin-ani siya:

GTX 460 1GB > GTX 460 768mb > GTX 465 >= GTX 460 SE

The GTX 560 Non-Ti btw is faster than the GTX 460 1GB.

[keropi]

NOt a Red-Team fanboy but here's what i know:

HD5850: 1440 shaders
HD6850: 960 shaders + improve tessellation + other optimizations

Others are questioning the validity of some optimizations such as image quality reduction starting with catalyst 10.10 upon release of the latter cards, where most reviewers make use of the latest drivers. As a result of the review, the 6850/6870 using the newer driver apparently was at par in performance with the 5850/5870, which at the time of their (Barts) review utilized the older drivers. In reality though, when both cards are run using same drivers, the 5850 is noticeably faster.

[Ezio_Auditore]

nabantayan nko sa uban(not all) HD 5000 series is mas labaw gamay ang iya memory bandwidth kesa HD 6000 series.
like: 5770 & 6770.

[pedrew16]

its true on 465<460. kabasa ko ani sa review, kalimut lang ko kung asa pero mas better ang performance sa 460 sa benchmarking. i forgot why but its true.

about sa radeon 6000 series, they did not make the predecessors by model no. scheme from previous series higher in performance, rather its slower than the 5000 series. example ang predecessor sa 5850 is actually the 6950, and not the 6850 if im not mistaken nya predecessor sa 5870 is the 6970, not the 6870 then 5970 to 6990. so mao if ul observe, mas mahal ang 5850 kaysa 6850 kai better man pud ang performance sa 5850.dont know y though why they made the rebranding this way but AMD did this in purpose. they surely did confuse consumers on this at first look. marketing strategy perhaps?

you can also watch this: &#x202a;MSI AMD Radeon HD 6870 1GB Video Performance Review Linus Tech Tips&#x202c;&rlm; - YouTube

hope this helps...

[street_of_no_return]

450 FTW mao ni ang pina ka taas nga rank sa 450.?


460 vs 470?

mas mahal ang 460 so 460 > 470?

[Sempron Guy]

470 is still faster, the reason naa ka gakakita nga GTX 470 being sold cheap kay napulihan na siya sa GTX 560 Ti w/c is faster and consumes less power. In other words mas efficient siya vs the GTX 470.

[street_of_no_return]

hmm okey.. dako ug impact ang phyics sa mga games.?

[pedrew16]

if u are specific to details makabantay ka pero kung d, d pud. few games supports phyx as for this time. when it comes to performance, dako dako pud ang impact sa physx sa VC. makaaffect cya like 20% decrease in performance when physX is enabled. depende pud unsa na card. mao others wud choose a dedicated phyx card (nvidia) paired with another card for game rendering(primary card) either Nvidia or AMD using "hybrid physX" to avoid bootlenecks.