Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 48

The Fraud of Evolution


This discussion is about "The Fraud of Evolution " in the "Spirituality & Occult - OLDER" forums.
wa ko kasabot. Haekel's fraud means Evolution is a fraud? Wa ko kasabot. Unsa man pasabot anang last line, is it trying to show that ...

  1. #11
    C.I.A. The_Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,989
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: The Fraud of Evolution


    wa ko kasabot. Haekel's fraud means Evolution is a fraud? Wa ko kasabot. Unsa man pasabot anang last line, is it trying to show that Evolution is a lie?

    arrogance.

    And ironically, Stephen Jay Gould was mentioned, but we shouldnt forget that Gould asserted NOMA (Non-Overlapping MAgisteria) or science is parallel to religion, both having different point of view but doesnt necessarily contradict each other. that is why the last line of the post is rather a conundrum to me.

    Religion relishes in Mystery in a way that it wants to things to remain a mystery, Science relishes in mystery in a way that it wish to conquer it. Still, i find it rather arrogant in the part of any religious "unit" to discredit science when it has nothing to give but religious hooplas.

  2. #12
    C.I.A.
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    3,130

    Default Re: The Fraud of Evolution

    very well said.

    Each one has a stand. so whether we like it or not no one can force some one on his side. hence it is best to express your view without demeaning others by derogatory remarks. speak your mind and post it. and let us decide which way to take.

    Peace to all :mrgreen:

  3. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    103

    Default Re: The Fraud of Evolution

    This is why I don't get to some people just to rule out evulotion is just a fraud. The fact is, we have been evolving since we started to learn how to write! There was evolution since and there will be evolution in the years to come.

  4. #14
    C.I.A. seven_segment's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    4,128

    Default Re: The Fraud of Evolution



    problem is...to some science tries to disprove religious beliefs...

    sort of telling your religion/belief is a fraud...to some/many issues...

    there is evolution...not to disprove God...but to prove that there is God!






  5. #15
    899
    899 is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    206

    Default Re: The Fraud of Evolution

    @The_child

    The hoax proves that macro evolution is not observable. That they have to fabricate evidence to prove their point.


    Religion is not trying to refute science, its trying to refute those unproven things that science wants religion to accept.

  6. #16
    C.I.A. The_Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,989
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: The Fraud of Evolution

    macro evolution is not observable

    so is there such thing as a micro evolution? there is a difference between both a macro and micro evolution? Dawkins argued that memes play great role in evolution, that natural selection happens in the the meme level - is that what you mean by micro evolution in contrast to macro evolution? really i dont know if there is such a dichotomy between the two.

    That they have to fabricate evidence to prove their point.
    why do you think scientists, thats plural, would take all that effort to fabricate evidence?
    stephen jay gould as mentioned by the article is neo-darwinist, also dawkins. Steve Pinkerton, the philosopher Daniel Denett, the evolutionary psychiatrist thomas somebody i forgot his last name. The whole evolution school of thought and its derivative schools, sociobiology, evolutionary psychology and others...


    Religion is not trying to refute science, its trying to refute those unproven things that science wants religion to accept
    if we are to follow the idea of Gould's NOMA or non-overlapping Magisteria, then theres nothing really to refute eh? what do you think, if we perhaps compare the probability of Religion in explaining this material reality to that of Science explaining this material reality?

    If religion has its own side, why would it interfere by assuming that science has unproven this thing or that, or questions the credibility of the scientific epistemology in reaching towards a conclusion? eh?


    religion makes a point in a field which is best explained by science. tell me is that credible?

  7. #17
    Infractions: 0/3 (6)
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Gender
    Male
    Posts
    7,296

    Default Re: The Fraud of Evolution

    ah basta, usa ra'y pangutana nako:

    Kun gikan ang tawo sa apes, then ngano naa pa man apes nahabilin karon?

    UNsa'y buot nila ipasabot, nabyaan na sila sa byahe?

    ;D

  8. #18
    C.I.A. rcruman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    6,384

    Default Re: The Fraud of Evolution

    All I can say is that, Science has nothing to do with the cheating of Evolution.
    Science is a study of facts, Evolution is not a fact.

    Peace!

  9. #19
    899
    899 is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    206

    Default Re: The Fraud of Evolution

    Yes there is a difference between micro and macro. What you just explained belongs to micro while macro mean that a simple entity changes into a complex entity(reptiles growing wings).


    i was only referring to those people who were involved.


    As you can see i used the word "unproven". Do you agree that there are things in science that can not be proven?






  10. #20
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    103

    Default Re: The Fraud of Evolution

    Science is a study of facts, Evolution is not a fact.

    ===hahahahahahaha.... hooo! Man, I just have to laugh... sorry but... it's too laughable.

  11.    Advertisement

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

 
  1. Hope is the life of love
    By n`gel in forum "Love is..."
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 08-16-2012, 01:06 AM
  2. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-02-2012, 09:34 PM
  3. Replies: 53
    Last Post: 11-24-2011, 07:26 AM
  4. Is god behind evolution as the process of his creation ?
    By cromagnon in forum Philosophical/Theological Debate
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 04-04-2010, 09:44 AM
  5. the voyage of jerle shannara
    By potterboy in forum TV's & Movies
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-08-2005, 10:27 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
about us
We are the first Cebu Online Media.

iSTORYA.NET is Cebu's Biggest, Southern Philippines' Most Active, and the Philippines' Strongest Online Community!
follow us
#top