Originally Posted by
BertR
In my opinion this quote means differently. I'm remembering from when I last saw it more than 3 years ago.
He was insane at the start of the movie, the role play-slash-treatment was effective, so he was cured. However, because he was cured he also remembered what happened to his family which was mainly his fault.
So he decided to pretend he wasn't cured in order to be lobotomized so he can forget. If he showed them the truth that he was cured, he will continue to live, but as a monster for killing his family. Choosing lobotomy will make him die a good man because he won't remember what he did.
But of course, I always believed movies are meant to be interpreted differently. I see you have a long list to go, so di nalang sa ko mag-add kay daghan gyud kaayo nindot mga movies nga imong gitawag og ambiguous. I'll suggest you start with "2001" and watch it with a good mental condition para ma-absorb nimo. haha. Charlie Kaufman-written films are also pretty good (Being John Malkovich, Adaptation, Eternal Sunshine) but Synecdoche, New York takes his ideas to a whole new level. Though it wasn't as well directed as his other films (he directed his own script), it is superbly written.