MERGED: RP-China Territorial Dispute, Related Events and Updates

[<SMILE>]

---

Kung dili pa lang tungod sa deterrence sa nuclear bombs, maorag mag-gubat na gyud apil na ta.

[yhokz101]

Kung dili pa lang tungod sa deterrence sa nuclear bombs, maorag mag-gubat na gyud apil na ta.

then it would be.. China vs Phils/Vietnam/Japan/Malaysia/Brunie/US/Australia/EU

[<SMILE>]

then it would be.. China vs Phils/Vietnam/Japan/Malaysia/Brunie/US/Australia/EU

Mao, puwerte gyud hinoong luoya sa China,
Japan lang daan puwerte ra ba gyung salbahisa anang ilang army.

In December of 1937, the Japanese Imperial Army marched into China's capital city of Nanking and proceeded to murder 300,000 out of 600,000 civilians and soldiers in the city. The six weeks of carnage would become known as the Rape of Nanking and represented the single worst atrocity during the World War II era in either the European or Pacific theaters of war.

The actual military invasion of Nanking was preceded by a tough battle at Shanghai that began in the summer of 1937. Chinese forces there put up surprisingly stiff resistance against the Japanese Army which had expected an easy victory in China. The Japanese had even bragged they would conquer all of China in just three months. The stubborn resistance by the Chinese troops upset that timetable, with the battle dragging on through the summer into late fall. This infuriated the Japanese and whetted their appetite for the revenge that was to follow at Nanking.

After finally defeating the Chinese at Shanghai in November, 50,000 Japanese soldiers then marched on toward Nanking. Unlike the troops at Shanghai, Chinese soldiers at Nanking were poorly led and loosely organized. Although they greatly outnumbered the Japanese and had plenty of ammunition, they withered under the ferocity of the Japanese attack, then engaged in a chaotic retreat. After just four days of fighting, Japanese troops smashed into the city on December 13, 1937, with orders issued to "kill all captives."
The History Place - Genocide in the 20th Century: Rape of Nanking 1937-38

[MrTuthaus]

mao ni akong kahadlokan...surprise butts3x...nya way andam mga tawo tawon...
wa tay mga armas kay illegal...naa galing, mga danao nga kagar...

nganong nakaingon man kag kagar ang mga armas sa danao boss?


nganong dili man...gawas kung naa tay anti-missile defense system...which we don't...and atong offensive, may di mo-kagar nang mga missles sa panahon pang MARCOS...

tirahon gud na kung asa ang sakit ug ang heart sa kontra which are the key cities...

nganong nakaingon man kag kagar ang mga armas sa danao boss?

[kit_cebu]

nganong nakaingon man kag kagar ang mga armas sa danao boss?

pasensya boss...ang akong nasuwayan man gud (kay mga pobreng tawo rami sa akong kabanay) kay mga danao nga kulorom or mga palusot...baratohon/low-grade/low-class hand guns...and yes, pabuto sa bag-ong tuig (sa balas gi-puntar kay di man ta boang2x nga adtos kahanginan pabuto), sus! puno 5 ka bangag, 3 ray ni-buto...

wa paman ko kahikap anang mga dagkong armas...

[MrTuthaus]

pasensya boss...ang akong nasuwayan man gud (kay mga pobreng tawo rami sa akong kabanay) kay mga danao nga kulorom or mga palusot...baratohon/low-grade/low-class hand guns...and yes, pabuto sa bag-ong tuig (sa balas gi-puntar kay di man ta boang2x nga adtos kahanginan pabuto), sus! puno 5 ka bangag, 3 ray ni-buto...

wa paman ko kahikap anang mga dagkong armas...

ahahaha ok boss hehe...

[yhokz101]

what Im doubtful with all these clamour is that, why would the US intervene and insist on using UNCLOS. America is not a party to the dispute, but its offer to act as a mediator on various claims based on “international law” is doubtful given that it is not a signatory to UNCLOS. The US has little to offer in resolving these territorial disputes, and suggesting that the South China Sea will cause an outbreak of military tensions in the region is not consistent with recent Sino-ASEAN ties that are steadily becoming closer - especially in the economic realm.

[MrTuthaus]

what Im doubtful with all these clamour is that, why would the US intervene and insist on using UNCLOS. America is not a party to the dispute, but its offer to act as a mediator on various claims based on “international law” is doubtful given that it is not a signatory to UNCLOS. The US has little to offer in resolving these territorial disputes, and suggesting that the South China Sea will cause an outbreak of military tensions in the region is not consistent with recent Sino-ASEAN ties that are steadily becoming closer - especially in the economic realm.

usa ray tubag ana boss it's so obvious nga only one country China would listen and think for a while sa ilang mga hinampak nga gibuhat sa artificial islands, which is the US... di ni maminaw ang mga chikwa sa mga gagmayng asian countries..

[yhokz101]

usa ray tubag ana boss it's so obvious nga only one country China would listen and think for a while sa ilang mga hinampak nga gibuhat sa artificial islands, which is the US... di ni maminaw ang mga chikwa sa mga gagmayng asian countries..

Pero boss, pa gahi man gani ang china sa US.. if naminaw pa, wa man gani na hadlok ni bugaw sa US spyplane ni agi sa disputed island, ni claim pa na China navy daw. By that ila na gi impose ilang authority maski disputed pa ang usa ka lugar, wa na hulga. mao ni ang timail-han na gahi ug ulo or naa jd gi barogan. pag ka toytoy jd nalang ani nila.

P.S. boss Tut, kanang imong avatar bah.. nagpa hungaw na cya? o nakita ang yang tut

[MrTuthaus]

Pero boss, pa gahi man gani ang china sa US.. if naminaw pa, wa man gani na hadlok ni bugaw sa US spyplane ni agi sa disputed island, ni claim pa na China navy daw. By that ila na gi impose ilang authority maski disputed pa ang usa ka lugar, wa na hulga. mao ni ang timail-han na gahi ug ulo or naa jd gi barogan. pag ka toytoy jd nalang ani nila.

P.S. boss Tut, kanang imong avatar bah.. nagpa hungaw na cya? o nakita ang yang tut

ahahahha giinitan boss.. ahahah