Originally Posted by
agila
pastilan ning tawhana ni, sa ato pa ang newyork, london ug manila dili na safe kay nakatilaw man pod to ug bombing. storyang hipokrito man nang imo bay, the best na ang cebu kung the best pero ayaw pod pataka ug post kay dili ta mga bata diri. ug about sa highrise, dili man na mao ang basihan sa progress kung dili ang investment, for example naay highrise project worth 1 billion, what's the difference between that and a sprawling low rise worth 1 billion pesos also? gets nimo?
I never claimed these cities (London, New York, Manila) are safe either .. all I'm saying is that IGNIZAN can't claim that DAVAO is safer than anywhere else because, obviously, it's not.
If you claim na dili ka bata - try to read and understand messages better. Call me a hypocrite after you read the previous exchanges, pero don't jump into conclusions right away when you have no idea what you're talking about. How am I being a hypocrite anyways? Did you see me say that Cebu is safe?
And good cities can't be based on how developed the city looks -having several skycrapers and malls around the area... or having sprawling developments. That is not the measure of a good city. A good city for me is one who offers high job opportunities - low traffic and polution - low crime rate - great school system - and places available for someone to relax and unwind on the weekends.