maka ila ba mo sa picture kung gi-capture gikan sa nikon or canon ?

[radiostar]

---

@ edoy

answer = no

but whats the point?

we'll actually na.ay difference... nya kung nag dugay naka sa canon or nikon maka tell ka sa difference...

parehas ani na pic

photo by: lito inso a.k.a crashburn



exif: 1/100s, f3.2, ISO6400, 5000 Kelvin White Balance

Nikon 24-70 2.8 / Canon 24-70 2.8L, no filters used.

Simple skin tone comparison. You decide.

[wooden_heart]

ug i-post lang o kanang internet file murag mailhan gyud, mag tan-aw ko sa sample gallery sa dpreview, lahi rajud ug color ang nikon ug canon...

[tackielarla]

we'll actually na.ay difference... nya kung nag dugay naka sa canon or nikon maka tell ka sa difference...

parehas ani na pic

photo by: lito inso a.k.a crashburn



exif: 1/100s, f3.2, ISO6400, 5000 Kelvin White Balance

Nikon 24-70 2.8 / Canon 24-70 2.8L, no filters used.

Simple skin tone comparison. You decide.

Canon: anemic
Nikon: gi-hepa

[hayden]

Maka-ila raman if Nikon or Canon, taas-taas lang nga istorya

[Chipmunk888]

we'll actually na.ay difference... nya kung nag dugay naka sa canon or nikon maka tell ka sa difference...

parehas ani na pic

photo by: lito inso a.k.a crashburn



exif: 1/100s, f3.2, ISO6400, 5000 Kelvin White Balance

Nikon 24-70 2.8 / Canon 24-70 2.8L, no filters used.

Simple skin tone comparison. You decide.

i can set the D3 to lower kelvin and adjust the picture control to get that tone.


dslrs nowadays are too advanced that can mimic different and wide variations.


differences are just company preferred factory default value settings of the camera photo processing. its just happened that nikon loves hepatitis-b while canon loves anemic to rip.

_

[akizuki]

kuyawa sa? makaila man ug unsa brand ang gigamit. experiencyado na jud.