What Scientist looking for is "GOD" and trying to get out of the picture.

[brownprose]

---

bro kalma lang, karon beh sa ako bana gikan ang description nga "God's Particle"?
did I label that? I just referred it from an article.


I don't have troubles in reading and understanding bro, its you who have trouble in settling directly to personal comments.
anhi ka maayo bro, I think you know that "hestirical" ive typed is the same "Hysterical" you're trying to point. Its just a typo error bro and I admit it. You can't defend your idea by a plain evidence. Look at all your post its towards me anymore not with the issue.

Ok I will let it pass, lets go back to the topic and let us give evidence not personal comments.
Pasensya na gud kung naay wrong spelling kay dili mani spelling contest, and in fact I admitted already that I'm just a first year college student due to financial problems, not need to keep on pointing this mistakes on me.
ako usbon og klarohon bro ha, when I used mislead it means I'm trying to mislead you from where you're heading to, your knowledge and understanding leading to taking God out of the picture. So I'm misleading you in that way to the knowledge and understanding of supreme BEING.
I will use your source : "1. to lead or guide wrongly; lead astray."
In this definition I'm guiding you wrongly to what you've believed that is right.
Ako dawaton bro nga misleading ako gibuhat sa imoha aron lang makakita kag kahayag nga naay Ginoo.
Kung tan-aw nimo kay misleading ako gibuhat sa imoha aw so be it.

bro wrong spelling rana bro dili ba ka kadawat ana, the thoughts that counts.
nawa ra gud sa dihang nitype kog "HESTERICAL" kay nakasabot ka nga "HYSTERICAL" ako pasabot kay its the thought.

Pero kung ang imo style kay ang pag-atake sa person kaysa principle aw sorry ka na lang dili na musaler sa akoa kay ako na gidawat daan sa ako kaugalingon nga ubos ko og wala ko katapos sa pagtungha kumpara ninyo nga mga professional mo. Mao ni imo nakat-onan bro nga iduso ang pagkatao sa usa ka tao?
Why not tackle the principles rather that personal comments and attacks.

Peace!

Rcruman...ang issue is not your educational attainment. Daghang wa ka tongtong og college rcruman but are PRUDENT and RESPONSIBLE in their language and information. Mao nay kulang nimo bro. If you read my posts well, i was pointing how you twisted information; how you indiscriminately use terms to suit your ideas. THAT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE USAGE rcruman. If you want a good discussion rcruman, don't insult people with such kind of tactics. Tan-awa ra pod ning imong style o --

In this definition I'm guiding you wrongly to what you've believed that is right.
Ako dawaton bro nga misleading ako gibuhat sa imoha aron lang makakita kag kahayag nga naay Ginoo.
Kung tan-aw nimo kay misleading ako gibuhat sa imoha aw so be it.

DO YOU THINK WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS RIGHT? BE RESPONSIBLE SAB BRO. DAKO NAMAN KAHA TA , KRISTOHANON MAN KAHA TA. Come on...

Ok back to topic rcruman...why do you say that the Higg's boson will change the way evolutionists think? What are your evidences/proofs? I have presented mine already thru the sources I have posted. Read them back. (Newsweek og Time Magazine (just click on those and read) Now its your turn. Again I want to hear your answer WHY THE HIGG'S BOSON or GOD'S PARTICLE according to you "will change some ATHEIST and EVOLUTIONIST."

What is God's Particle and What is Higg's Boson? Since niingon man ka nako nga nagpataka ko. Correct me daw if I was wrong.

I am sorry if i had offended you in a way...ang ako bro is and as i have repeatedly said...please don't take your sources out of context and please clarify your terminologies because some people get insulted by it.

[Hellblazer]

i wonder where the thread starter is now...hope he gets back with a more sane answer.

nangita pa siyag verse sa iya bible. ('c',)

[aubrey_pearl]

sir brownprose and sir rcruman

peace mong duha oiz. istorya ra gud ni ato dire. u both have good points bros.

[NASYO]

to rcruman

try to "IMAGINE" what you like to be..

then do it with good intentions. and ACT maturely..

[rcruman]

to rcruman

try to "IMAGINE" what you like to be..

then do it with good intentions. and ACT maturely..

Bro Imagination is for hopeless.
People imagine because they want to escape from reality.

A God fearing person must have faith, to hope things which is not seen and that is God and His promise.

Peace!

[rcruman]

sir brownprose and sir rcruman

peace mong duha oiz. istorya ra gud ni ato dire. u both have good points bros.

I don't keep hate in my heart and mind sister.
I just want to discuss, that is why I don't want to engage in physical debate or frontal debate as what others here want to happened because of my physical structure they will gain more interest to look down me.

I prefer discussing here with the Bible as my reference and some reference or articles that consider GOD.

PEace!

[rcruman]

[b]DO YOU THINK WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS RIGHT? BE RESPONSIBLE SAB BRO. DAKO NAMAN KAHA TA , KRISTOHANON MAN KAHA TA. Come on...

bro angay pa ba ni ipangutana? kita tanan mubarog gyud kay nitoo ta nga ato prinsipyo maoy sakto.

Rcruman...ang issue is not your educational attainment. Daghang wa ka tongtong og college rcruman but are PRUDENT and RESPONSIBLE in their language and information. Mao nay kulang nimo bro. If you read my posts well, i was pointing how you twisted information; how you indiscriminately use terms to suit your ideas. THAT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE USAGE rcruman. If you want a good discussion rcruman, don't insult people with such kind of tactics. Tan-awa ra pod ning imong style o --

so twisted diay sa dihang typo error ang ako "hysterical" og 'mislead" nga word ako gigamit?
Did I insult you here? AKo na gani ang nagpaubos nga wala koy grado.
Pero kung tan-aw nimo insulto ang ako statement nga gikan sa bible or in-line with the bible aw wala koy mahimo ana kung mao na imo pagtan-aw. Kung para sa imoha kay insulto kung gikan sa bible aw imo pud na.

Ok back to topic rcruman...why do you say that the Higg's boson will change the way evolutionists think? What are your evidences/proofs? I have presented mine already thru the sources I have posted. Read them back. (Newsweek og Time Magazine (just click on those and read) Now its your turn. Again I want to hear your answer WHY THE HIGG'S BOSON or GOD'S PARTICLE according to you "will change some ATHEIST and EVOLUTIONIST."

aw kini maoy discussion dili kay birahan ang spelling or grammar, bro its just a matter of consideration. Just ask elaboration if I posted wrong spelling or grammar I'm willing to be corrected in grammar and spelling (hinay gyud ko ani nga dapita during my highschool days--line of 7 gyud ko ani pero ang ubang subject ra ang dili.)

Ok back to topic rcruman...why do you say that the Higg's boson will change the way evolutionists think?

let me remind you first, dili maghuman dayon ato discussion kung usa ra ka post, have patience and consideration bro total wala may nagdalidali nato dinhi og wala man tay gibayran.

so I will answer.

in Higgs boson it will contradict with the theory of Evolution because we didn't evolved if we will base it with the higgs boson as rescent findings of Science.
Let me ask you bro first, with our latest technology of Electron Microscope have they seen this "H" element or Higgs Boson?

What are your evidences/proofs? I have presented mine already thru the sources I have posted. Read them back. (Newsweek og Time Magazine (just click on those and read) Now its your turn. Again I want to hear your answer WHY THE HIGG'S BOSON or GOD'S PARTICLE according to you "will change some ATHEIST and EVOLUTIONIST."

I will refer it to the bible:
God is spirit and we human or living creatures has spirits (do you agree?).
and things can't be seen are the other part of God's creation.
Atheist and Evolutionist rely on physical evidence.
But I've wonder how come Evolutionist believed on "MISSING LINK" in fact they didn't see it or found it.

I am sorry if i had offended you in a way...ang ako bro is and as i have repeatedly said...please don't take your sources out of context and please clarify your terminologies because some people get insulted by it.

bro don't worry about it bro.
I'm not offended because in the first place I admitted already my educational attainment.
Ako lang advise sa imoha kay ask for elaboration don't conclude directly.
Now we've set things clear so Hope with our next discussion we will be posting objective statement not subjective. This is a long discussion bro, have patience.

Peace!

[NASYO]

@ rcruman

you mean that people who imagine things that would really happen are hopeless?

how? any basis?

[rcruman]

@ rcruman

you mean that people who imagine things that would really happen are hopeless?

how? any basis?

can you elaborate this statement bro?
nag-imagine gani kay dili mahitabo pero imo statement kay "that would really happen".
beh kung "would really happen" man kaha, mahitabo ba nga walay langit?
mag-imagine ba kaha ka kung mahitabo.
Like ani bro, most of man likes to imagine that they're SUPERMAN (Clark Kent) pero ako question nimo "would really happen" ba? bro why not open your eyes when imagining aron maka realize ka nga dili mahitabo.

Kabantay ka sa Imagine kasagaran kay magsugod og "IF", "UNTA", "mayta"?

Peace!

[ix_888]

To judge another person in one's own understanding of reality is in itself unjust...

And so in the process, he will also be judged by the higher powers...