which part did i generalize??
as of now, vigilantes did slow down crime here..
but it would be better if they don't kill..
just hoping criminals get a good punishment..

which part did i generalize??
as of now, vigilantes did slow down crime here..
but it would be better if they don't kill..
just hoping criminals get a good punishment..
katong mga targetunon paminaw nila, maau pay mag bag o na cla.
i am with jugs 06 ani nga discussion...i am against vigilantism...
- if the system is not working it should be fixed and di lang pasagdan...instead of taking the short cut and resorting to vigilantism
- i believe in the premise...innocent until proven guilty...so regardless of the crime...it should be properly reviewed in court ...BUT again this is only good if the system is working *sigh*
- kuyawan ko aning mga vigilante...puede ni sila mo break away and mahimong guns for hire...what will stop them from becoming paid killers ....kakuyaw ba kon bisan dili ta criminal...nya naay mag lagot nato...ma tipi lang ta sayon2 kay naa mga ex-vigilante modawat ug bayad to kill....(parehas ba sa grupo ni bin laden...after gi train sa cia ...na nahimo na nuong worst nightmare ron sa america)

i hope kanang mga snatcher ug holdupper ang tirahan next sa mga vigilante..
Ayaw kalimti ang mga tighimo ug shabu, mga esmagler, mga tirador sa Akrho ug Tau Gamma. Kanus-a man ilang skedyul?Originally Posted by digitalsuperman
.. most of the vigilante's target are those in and out of jail. those who have a ton of criminal record.Originally Posted by jugs_06
^^^^^ yup i agree so far for the records no fresh criminals are being shoot by this group..

^yep, kanang mga naay record..so naa gyud basis sila dili lang pataka ug pamusil.
it's "most".. not all..Originally Posted by fingolfin
Similar Threads |
|