
Originally Posted by
FranZeno
Because that's their policy for hiring IENs, because our curriculum/standards are not the same with theirs that's why they need those extra years as requirements for IENs. If it's their own graduates then they won't need them to have experience.
Actually in some hospitals here, esp private hosp, fresh grads are on probation for months before they get hired. But they will be hired after probation and they are not made to pay for being on probation.
But did you ever stop to think about why this is their policy? Maybe it's because in their experience, fresh grads from our country really aren't up to their standards. I couldn't think of any other reason why, policies are always there because someone thought it was needed. It isn't some mere formality that needs to be done away with. The work experience requirement is tacked on because they only want quality nurses, not fresh grads who are likely to have skills gaps. I absolutely do not believe that most fresh grads (whatever the course) already know everything they need to know to excel at their field. In the IT field, it often takes years and years of apprenticeship and low-level work to become a full programmer. Even doctors require years of low-paying residency before they can practice as a full doctor. It's arrogant for anyone to think they don't need further training when they are simply fresh graduates, whatever the field.
You can blame CHED for this really, they've issued too many licenses for nursing schools and so there are too many substandard schools churning out substandard grads. You may come from a good school and be a good student, but the majority of grads are not in the same position. That is why this training from work experience is needed to provide a necessary assurance to foreign governments that a deficiency in skills will not eventuate when our nurses are deployed into their communities.