
Originally Posted by
jolkyre
beg to disagree, not all ASUS mobo sucks as you claim, its just a bad batch, i use ASUS MOBO and never had a problem with it with regards to OC, and DFI as the best....nah, id choose ABIT. Wink
Its the limited voltage options of the Asus that sucks. OCing a MOBO is all in the BIOS, adjusting the mem timings, bus frequency, CPU frequency(For Mobile Athlons), and Voltage. Sad to say Asus fails in the voltage flexibility options, Since asus particularly A7N-8x, you can't adjust the Dimm voltage and the VDD voltage, that would lead to very limited overclocking capability.
Unlike Epox you can adjust almost all voltage including VDD, VCore, VDimm, and AGP voltage, capable of high range voltage limits, and to mention adjusting your voltage is very useful to overclockers since it would result in higher OC stability.
Same as DFI has a higher voltage range and stability, Newer revision of DFI socket A MOBOS even has 4 DDR dims compare others which only has three in the socket A category.
The reason why choose DFI over Epox is that the memory of DFI overclocks better. DFI has a wider range of Dimm voltage upto 3.1v, compared to 2.9 maximum dimm voltage of most Epox, MOBOs.
To sum it all The more voltage range and adjustability the MOBO the better overclocker and stable it is. (not a feature of Asus MOBOs)
Which of course you must have the responsibility of cooling your OCed MOBO.
I dont know about Asus MOBOS I've heard that other people has achieved high OC with this MOBO I suspect theyre using a modded BIOS to unlock their voltage limitations, maybe even hardware voltmodding. Which requires hardwork unlike DFI and Epox with voltage options already unlocked at Stock BIOS.
Also I don't know of the newer Asus MOBOS, the ASUS A8N-E socket 939, If they still have this limitations.
I understand why ASUS has limited their voltage because to achieve longer lifespan and safety to the MOBO, which adds to the quality and durability. All I can say is Asus is not for for OCers but for average users.
maybe for you amd proc fans, asus boards suck. but its very different for me, an intel fan.
And Hello, have'nt you heard of 64-bit processing. Haven't you heard about new AMDs 64 bit procs the newcastle, hammer, and FX-55 San Diego cores. And what does intel come upto measure up, only their Prescott core. Hehe.

Wake up guys AMD is far of in the lead already.
But its entirley upto you to choose.
@fuzzylogic: 800 -> 810mhz and you brag about this

hahaha! <roflmao> even a bored high school student (with lots of moolah and technical know-how) can do better than that...
I think Intel is bragging with their 800mhz FSB. Which in truth people misunderstood and realy believe that its 800mhz FSB compared to AMDs 200mhz FSB. To inform you all the the real FSB of your Pentium 4s is 800/4. and it does'nt even has hypertransport technology(significantly incraese FSB data data speed) unlike AMD, thats why I can say that Intel is bragging their 800mhz FSB.