Another example that MIGHT make sense to you is. Atom1=gas atom, atom2=thermometer and atom3=satellite.
What is preventing the sun from heating up atom2 and atom3 since it has no problem heating up atom1?
Another example that MIGHT make sense to you is. Atom1=gas atom, atom2=thermometer and atom3=satellite.
What is preventing the sun from heating up atom2 and atom3 since it has no problem heating up atom1?
I won't be explaining anymore dude. It's clear that you don't think science is factual. Any explanation I'll come up you will just scoff at it without trying to know more. It's like teaching chess to a chicken; explaining to the chicken how to play but the chicken won't listen and walks all over the chess board claiming to be the winner. It's futile. It was fun while it lasted.
But I'm still curious, Why call scientists 'priests'? You clearly have an agenda. You haven't answered my question about what you believe. And please, don't dodge this question again.
i'm nosebleed. hehe
haha ka lisod sabton ani oi. pero kasabot man ko gamay pag research nako about radiation, heat, thermal equilibrium. nya ang mga question ni TS na answer nmn sad sa taghan threads in the internet.
@wrt54gs7
unsay na libogan nimo>? i google lng yan. nakasabot ko dayun... why can't you? imo na research?
Similar Threads |
|