Banilad Foodland Flyover

[duke pikaso]

---

^^

sakto man ang inyu understanding about accommodation for each vehicle..

but the prob here is traffic.. di man gud constantly nag dagan ang mga PUJs, unlike private cars and taxis.. ang mga jeep kay magsige hunong bisag asa which cause or in effect of traffic..

mao jud dapat iimplement ug strikto ang PUJ stop and no stopping/parking areas para di mag congest ang mga dalan..

plus, rerouting some pujs and coding, mao na ang maau na solusyon! para nko ah.. hehehe..
:mrgreen:

[jare73]

Kita mo sa SRP nga wala pay PUJ na mag pataka ug hunong, traffic ba? And kita ba mo SRP naay flyover?The same sa mandaue reclamation area.

no hard feelings sa PUJ drivers noh, pero abuso nasad ning ila, deritso lang hunong bisan naa sa tunga, nya ikaw nga pasajero ma langay ka kay hapit tanan tao mag tindog sa dalan bisan wala ni para hunongan!

Foodland Flyover, maka tabang gyud sa pag ease sa traffic dinha na intersection, but it wont solve sa traffic scene sa whole banilad route. Maayo unta ila lagi patas-an from foodland to after UC, dako gyud na tabang, pero pag naog sa flyover hunongan nasad sa jeep, same thing!

[Kwakie]

I agree with Jare73. Kaning mga PUJ drivers mora man silay naka tag-iya sa dan. Mo kalit lang ug preno mag pakanaog ug pasahero sa taliwa or bisan asa nila feel mo lugar. Pirmi lang tang deriyot ma momo sa lubot sa ilang jeep. Limit lang giod unta ang number of PUJ's per franchise. Naa pay uban itom kaayo ug aso sa tambutso. Morag kinahanglan man ni sila ug drivers education and stricter rules para wa nay pabuang buang.

[eax]

Ang nakapa-it dinha sa Banilad kay walay jeepney stop. If you look closely gamay kaayo ang dalan from Foodland to Cabancalan.

[makoyvelasco]

for now, butangan unta nila ug CITOM diha. di lang sa country mall dapit kundi sa foodland pud. then they should implement traffic rules strictly para kanang mga PUJs di na magpataka ug hunong

[grabejud]

generally speaking, jeepneys nowadays is more of a problem than a solution. siguro para ninyo convenient siya kay makasakay ka kung ganahan, pero dili ko agree nga paspas ang jeepney, siguro affordable siya gamay pero maghulat mostly nga mapuno usa modagan unya pataka pajud ug unload, and most of em now are undisciplined with regards to road courtesy. Daghan solusyon sa paghusay sa traffic. Ok ko anang buses during specific time, like every 10-15 mins, naa rana nato pag disiplina ug pag plano sa atoa oras nga mosakay ta and then other solution is the LRT type of transport.

[Rubix]

I think, mao man na sila katong mga grupo ma-affected sa kung naay flyover.

We should also think, na kanang naa sa Banilad flyover is a public interest na siya. Sila, wala na mabuhat ana.

Yes you are right. As businessmen, the group is also protecting their own interest. BUT more importantly the wellfare of the public. In fact most business men in the vicinity are willing to give up portions of their property at a loss for public convenience: TPE, BTC and foodland. When I say loss.... its in millions of pesos worth of property. In fact, BTC has already allocated their front yard for a wider road. But Why waste so much money (126 m )for a flyover that does not work?? that is why the group proposed an alternative. In the absence of an alternative, the flyover might sound a very juicy proposal. A complex problem require a creative solution NOT a band-aid solution so please read and understand the position paper as posted.

[M@rv|n]

^^

sakto man ang inyu understanding about accommodation for each vehicle..

but the prob here is traffic.. di man gud constantly nag dagan ang mga PUJs, unlike private cars and taxis.. ang mga jeep kay magsige hunong bisag asa which cause or in effect of traffic..

mao jud dapat iimplement ug strikto ang PUJ stop and no stopping/parking areas para di mag congest ang mga dalan..

plus, rerouting some pujs and coding, mao na ang maau na solusyon! para nko ah.. hehehe..
:mrgreen:

anha nana mo enter ang mga citom para manakop :d nga maoy mo disiplina ana nila

Kita mo sa SRP nga wala pay PUJ na mag pataka ug hunong, traffic ba? And kita ba mo SRP naay flyover?The same sa mandaue reclamation area.

kay wala paman mga establishments sa SRP ... tan-awa ang mango ave. from robinsons going to shs-j during rush hours... you can barely see a PUJ

[pinoytayo]

I think we need brilliant engineers. Likewise, we should also minimize Jeepneys franchise. Grabe ka daghan sa jeepney. Why not use BUSES instead?

[nab_uang]

the flyover will not be effective if they will not reduce the number of PUJs plying on that area...

But It seems like it's very difficult to remove them... surely the opeartors will make noise....

Therefore I would suggest to the LTFRB, they should make two franchises for the PUJs... Morning Franchise and Afternoon Franchise...

In that way, they can limit the number of PUJs... para dili tanang jeepney managan tibuok adlaw... it will help to ease the traffic...

And also they should strictly impose the PUJ's load and unload area....