Just in: A child fell from the 2nd floor of Sm City Cebu

[digitalsuperman]

---

dugay naman na nga design sa sm nga kanang mga glass railings. sa akong namatngunan karon paman ko kadungog nga na ingon ani. para nako ang sole responsibility naa sa guardian sa bata. bata gud na.dapat imong mata naa gyud pirmi sa bata. magdala gani ug bata sa sm mas maayo ibutang sa kanang mga playhouse kay malingaw rana ang bata didto naa pay magbantay.

[simoncpu]

qoute me even one line where i explicity said that no one has the right to criticize a parent because they themselves are not parents.

Thus spake shearts:

"before lagi mosulti nga ang majority sa responsibility naa sa parents, panganak sa lagi mo, bantayi jud na permi maski 1-2 years lang. other than that, wala mo sa katungod mosulti na majority of the blame is sa parents."

"i'm essentially speaking from my vantage point that the words those who are saying that parents are the ones to blame/are responsible are hollow & meaningless unless that person is a parent."

asa man ang bakak ana? are you even properly reading what i'm saying here? again i said EXPLICITY, do you even know what that word means?

friendly tip: before you reply, try to understand everything that is being said before letting your fingers get the better of you. thus, saying your analytical skills need improvement is an understatement.

This is so hilarious.

[cliff_drew]

dugay naman na nga design sa sm nga kanang mga glass railings.

mao lagi. nag wonder gani ko unsaon kaha pag maintain sa breakable glass same sa ilang giingon diri nga wala kunoy proper maintenance ang SM ana.

[shearts]

ani nalang....kung atoa tong anak unya bana/asawa tika, ikaw kuyog sa atong anak ato nga time pagkahitabo.

mo come up sa akong mind ang SM jud ako pabayron...pero ikaw maoy responsable ato nga time..ayaw kog rasoni nga sala sa SM.

kay ang SM walay kalabutan ninyong duha sa bata...ayaw sad kog rasoni nga kiat kaayo atong anak...

ani pud ni ha. as a reliability & maintenance admin, we have very strict rules, policies & sanctions to ensure the safety of all workers sa processing area.

ingana naman gai mi ka-strict na employees lang ang maka access sa area, how much more nga public place pa ni ang SM?

as an establishment that caters the public, responsibility jud ni sa SM nga maganticipate sila incidents like this.

another thing, this has been mentnioned by some people here na this is not ordinary glass, naa na mga liki2x & that alone is already a clear sign of negligence. maski barier or guard naman lang unta mag-ali ana nga facility in question, wala jud.

karon sala japon na sa bata? mao lagi na gi-ingon nako, dili jud mo makasabot unsay point of view as a parent kay wala pa mo inyo anak.

i'm telling you, once magka-anak naka, you may not admit it but looking back at what you're saying here, tunlon ra jud ni nimo.

This is so hilarious.

damn right it is hilarious. hilarious in the sense that you're trying to drive home a point with no solid basis. for your sake, please read everything i said & think before you try to make yourself silly trying to prove a point where there's no apparent proper basis.

glass by definition, breakable, but i don't think SM would be so lackadaisical enough to use ordinary glass as barriers. if this is true, then all the more jud nga mo-file ug case against SM.

like i said, naa na gud daw mga liki2x, maintenance like ilisan ang glass.

i don't think oridinary kids can break these types of glass just by bumping into them or becoming spiderman on the glass barrier, unless naa to dugo ni chuck norris ang bata, as someone mentioned earlier.

[cliff_drew]

another thing, this has been mentnioned by some people here na this is not ordinary glass, naa na mga liki2x & that alone is already a clear sign of negligence. maski barier or guard naman lang unta mag-ali ana nga facility in question, wala jud.

i don't think nakakita ka sa actual nga nawong sa glass. yawg tuo sa uban where in the end moingon nga dili sila expert ana. usa pa kung naay liki2x, naay ebidensya? yawg tuo daun sa hearsay.

maski barier or guard naman lang unta mag-ali ana nga facility in question, wala jud.

unsay pasabot nimo ani, after sa pagkahitabo or before? kay kung after naa tawon guard mag roving ug mamadlong. i already said this in my previous post. pero kung before, i would say, 'what?'.

[digitalsuperman]

mao lagi. nag wonder gani ko unsaon kaha pag maintain sa breakable glass same sa ilang giingon diri nga wala kunoy proper maintenance ang SM ana.

ambot lang kaha if unsay pasabot anang ilang proper maintenance. normally imo raman na trapohan ang mga glass. hehe.mao raman na pag maintain siguro. im not sure sad di pud ko suhito.

ang point ani kay bantayan gyud ang bata. manuroy gani ug SM then magdala ug bata bantayan gyud.dili gyud magdanghag. kung dili gani makabantay aw ibutang lang sa playhouse. ibilin nimo didto 2 hours.payts na.

[shearts]

i don't think nakakita ka sa actual nga nawong sa glass. yawg tuo sa uban where in the end moingon nga dili sila expert ana. usa pa kung naay liki2x, naay ebidensya? yawg tuo daun sa hearsay.

even if wala liki ang kato nga glass barrier in question, how can a 6yr old ordinary child break a barrier glass, assuming nga dili to ordinary glass gigamit sa SM?

as a friend of mine who was nearby national bookstore at that time said, nagsige na ug gukod ang inahan sa bata, but kusog ra kaayo ang dagan sa bata mao to nadasmag siya sa glass barrier.

i have siad this before that yes, naa jud blame ang parents but it is wrong to put majority of the blame sa parents. the majority of the blame still goes to SM.

[simoncpu]

i don't think nakakita ka sa actual nga nawong sa glass. yawg tuo sa uban where in the end moingon nga dili sila expert ana. usa pa kung naay liki2x, naay ebidensya? yawg tuo daun sa hearsay.



unsay pasabot nimo ani, after sa pagkahitabo or before? kay kung after naa tawon guard mag roving ug mamadlong. i already said this in my previous post. pero kung before, i would say, 'what?'.

Yepp. Ang usa sad sa rason nganong wala ko nituo nga negligent ang SM* kay badlongon sa baya me nga bata; naa jud guard mag roving2x sa North Wing pahawaon me kung mosandig sa glass. Di ni joke, not exaggerating at all.


* Although I believe that SM has the moral obligation to compensate the family.

[digitalsuperman]

even if wala liki ang kato nga glass barrier in question, how can a 6yr old ordinary child break a barrier glass, assuming nga dili to ordinary glass gigamit sa SM?

as a friend of mine who was nearby national bookstore at that time said, nagsige na ug gukod ang inahan sa bata, but kusog ra kaayo ang dagan sa bata mao to nadasmag siya sa glass barrier.

i have siad this before that yes, naa jud blame ang parents but it is wrong to put majority of the blame sa parents. the majority of the blame still goes to SM.

boss pananglitan nag drive ko.dayon nagtext ko while driving nagdanghag ko.nabangga ko sa imong koral sa imo balay then pwerte gubaa sa imong koral. so pasabot nimo majority ana imong sala?

[shearts]

boss pananglitan nag drive ko.dayon nagtext ko while driving nagdanghag ko.nabangga ko sa imong koral sa imo balay then pwerte gubaa sa imong koral. so pasabot nimo majority ana imong sala?

as you said, balay nako, akong koral. akong koral, ordinary materials ra kay balay ra man.

sala na nimo kay as an adult, you're very well aware that dili pwede mag-text & drive. so based on your arguement, given the example of my house, sala nimo & other than that, paninglan jud tika sa damages nabuhat nimo sa koral sa ako balay.

whereas sa SM, daku nga establishment that accepts the public to their establishment.