Is Evolutionist Science worth believing?

[Sinyalan]

---

I still want to know if they think that all the major discoveries in paleontology and human archeology/anthropology are all fakes.

-RODION

Let's listem to what they have to say about your questions pre.

[Hellblazer]

maybe they fail to be open-minded people. they only believe what they want to believe because that's what's been taught to them since they were a child. they tend to dismiss anything that contradicts to their beliefs for fear that they are wrong even if the evidence is right infront of them. i pity them.

[Sinyalan]

kaw ni ubos sa imong kaugalingon dong... ikaw ni sulti nga gakaon ka saging unya ang ungoy ga kaon saging mao nga ungoy pud ka. so kaon kuto! kay imong mga kaparehas nga ungoy kaon man kuto, lamian man gani sila.

So, dili diay ka mokaon ug saging ho chia? if not, then you must be the most sophisticated human among Ape-man. Tawn sab nimo dhong, nars man kaha ka and you are not using your brain to think on clear ventures. typical close-minded.

a sophisticated na d i ka sa noh, so dili ka ungoy, you have nothing to do with being a monkey, right? so where is evolution now since you are not a monkey of any sort. and a totally sophisticated being, made in the image and likeness of GOD.

HUH? did I say something like that? I said WE EVOLVED - that includes you! from a sophisticated animal and if you want to connect apes to humans then yes. What's wrong being an ape? and btw, your ability to think that we are made in the likeness of god is all crap. di ba your genesis book says, let "US" make... being said, it's not one god but many. Sayup na gani imong bible you keep on arguing you have been created by magic.

there you go, a fake evolutionist admitting he is not of any monkeys wnanabee humans.

Like you, you creationist (kuno) that appropriating which has specific and limited only to the bible. Nothing more.

that's why I am a creationist because I Faith in my GOD. unlike you a fake who hid in the name of science but employs too far off imaginary magic, transforming everything living from a rock. and everything else from dust.

Now, YOU ARE A FAKE! that's your best answer pre because you can not justify enough argument, why? You always have faith... faith which is NOT SCIENTIFIC in the frist place. what's this imaginary magic nga all creationist such as you believed on single specific idea.. GOD DID IT. that's magic! what I believe is far more than you imagined because there is no MAGIC involve. Your good at twisting arguments - evolution is religion, evolution is magic, evolution is not science. To scale you from 1 to 10, you're .0001 about evolution and to think nga nars man unta.

in the end that one word for you still stands! ---------- incapacitated!

hahahaha... that's far you can get. You haven't answered my human anatomy question if you can find a complete chapter in your bible. Palaban dayun sa ginoo ho chia because through your FAITH... he will guide you to become a better creationist. hahahahaha... incapacitated? right back at you ho chia!

[Hellblazer]

serves him right. hehehe.

[Lord_Ac]

There's a very big difference in believing what you're seeing and seeing what you're believing.

Unfortunately, many people choose the latter.

[Mr.Ho_chia]

Come on!

pls dont bring this argument to Science versus Religion. Science can support their claim, like jumping out of the window and you go down,thats called gravity. allele fluctuation in the genes is called evolution. But the explanation is not complete yet as we speak, but who knows that many many years from now as they are charting many many many uncharted territories in our genes they might come up with a complete explanation of Evolution.


The difference between unsatisfied evidence of science and Religion is, In Science there is actually an observable trends ,whereas in religion there is no observable scientific trend to prove that there is a God who created species. According to a respected figure of creationism,he said, "Creationism is not science". take a cue from there.

Again...Observable mechanism= Theory. Science cant come up with theories if WALA silay na obserbahan. This is no faith. It is base on OBSERVABLE trend.


proof? what do you want?

prove it. your fluctuation of the genes. how it works, use science to do it.
many many years........ hmmmm........... so until then, since it is not proven by science, let's not call it science coz, it is not. evolution have been there for over 150 years, and still no sign of concrete scientific proof that explain a rock becomes a living organism.

and if you can read again, i said that i have faith in My GOD that HE created everything.

the question here is... if there is really scientific evidence to prove evolution from rock to life form. from dirt to universe. from hydrogen to the complete elements in the periodic table.

because if there is none at all, then it is hope and faith. just like what i have with my GOD. and so, evolution can never be science it is like mine faith and religion!

you say they have observed it? yah right, they have observed rocks to come alive. they have observe hydrogen transforming to potassium. then show it!


what do i want for proof. simple chemical evolution, show it!

[chad_tukes]

bottom line is, neither SCIENCE nor FAITH wins the argument of what we call the formation of "LIFE".

it is totally up to the person whether he/she believes in GOD or SCIENCE... simple as that.

EVOLUTION has never been proven by SCIENCE, nor has the origin of MANKIND been proven by RELIGION.

[Mr.Ho_chia]

Then its me who is using diversionary tactics eh? WOW! Why dont you try to review the previous pages and try to determine who was diverting. Geez...

You misread my post Mister. IM NOT SAYING EVOLUTION REQUIRES FAITH. I WAS ACTUALLY STATING OTHERWISE!!

Man, I dont castigate you because you believe in GOD. Im just trying to make you realize how unfair you are as far as the discussion is concerned!

You are not supposed to judge whether we made a point or not...YOU ARE NOT A MODERATOR! and worse yet, YOU ARE ON ONE SIDE!

Better know the difference between belief and faith Sir...Geeez...


Alel

and you are? as if you are not on the other side as well.

it is you who says creation is magic because GOD made us from dust.

common. you believe that we came from dirt, isn't it equally magical? why the double standard? because you want to be the judge, the jury and the executioner at the same time.

yah belief based on hope and faith............ is seen in evolution. i understand them.

so can you now give me your best scientific evidence? so we may stop the yada-yaho-yawyaw thing?

[Mr.Ho_chia]

oi, welcome back yikes -este spikes-csa! warned man lagi ka dhong.... hehehehe... anyway, you are sure that you accepted microevolution over macroevolution. Here's a question for you pre... what biological or logical barriers prevent the former from becoming the latter?

scientific evidence! that's the barrier!

[Mr.Ho_chia]

so, this is the essence of what constitutes microevolution? Let me ask you again the same question... what biological or logical barriers prevent the former from becoming the latter? I'll modify my question, explain what logical or biological barriers would prevent microevolutionary changes from becoming macroevolutionary changes over long spans of time?

Even so spikes, you are leaning to evolutionary process. This is what creationist fall short because microevolution is regarded as evolutionary changes within a species, such that mating and producing fertile offspring. So what makes you think that creationism agreed on microevolution?

natubag naka, waka ka get? more genetic information kuno, wala. genetic information are blue prints that serve as our boundaries, if you dont have that info, you wont get it. kuha na?

scientific evidence is the best armamentarium you can ever have. sad to say you don't have it!