Banilad Foodland Flyover

[nab_uang]

---

The system will include the timetables... meaning the buses will follow their timetables so that the passenger could plan their journey time better...

Dili sila ma-late ani kay makahibalo naman sila unsang orasa mo-agi and BUS... not unless ma-late sila sa timing sa BUS.... so they should wait for another 15 mins....

Yeah correct! ang PUJ paspas ug affordable... But too many PUJ's with undisciplined drivers nga pataka lang og pamasahiro... mosamot jud ka-traffic... we will end up ma-late tang tanan....

[jare73]

Maka late gyud sa tanan ang PUJ!Langay kaayo ang driver, labi na wala pasajero, then ma apil ka langay ang tanan nag sunod niya. Labi na dinha sa foodland, mura na gihimo ug terminal, mag hinay ug maayo hangtod ma stop sign! If you build a flyover, then mo hunong gihapon ang PUJ pag naog, same thing, traffic! Yup, its only here in the philippines ang jeepney, didnt you ask why? If this is a cost effective transport system, how come other countries dont adopt jeepneys? Imagine riding a jeepney in let say singapore or hong kong=traffic! I think its time to change, like when we changed from horses to PUJs. As for the drivers, they ll just have to find other jobs. Having jeepneys dont solve our unemployment rate anyway.

[Rubix]

We all have a piece of our mind to say.... Yes its true that jeepney causes traffic... BUT I think, as an architect, The root cause of traffic is the lack of URBAN PLANNING. If there were alternate routes to ply, there wouldnt be as much jeepneys plying one route right?? But the issue on hand now, is the building of the flyover. I am for providing an alternate route rather than building flyover. A flyover only facilitates movement of vehicles but it does not reduce the volume of traffic. Please read the sunstar page 3 today. or you can visit this website:
http://www.geocities.com/btsc2007/

[Rubix]

We all have a piece of our mind to say.... Yes its true that jeepney causes traffic... BUT I think, as an architect, The root cause of traffic is the lack of URBAN PLANNING. If there were alternate routes to ply, there wouldnt be as much jeepneys plying one route right?? But the issue on hand now, is the building of the flyover. I am for providing an alternate route rather than building flyover. A flyover only facilitates movement of vehicles but it does not reduce the volume of traffic. Please read the sunstar page 3 today. or you can visit this website:
http://www.geocities.com/btsc2007/

[kots_isko]

in bangkok ang singapore,, you can see many two lane fly-overes with traffic lights in the next 150m... it does not only exist in cebu.

well.. sa tinood.. ang mga jeepney mao gyudy number one cause sa problem.. sobra ra kaayo kadaghan.. tapos pataka lang ug hunong...

another problem diha is walay proper urban planning... ang cebu patuyang lang ug approve or hatag ug mga building permits sa mga establishments diha not thinkiing nga these establishments have caused so much traffic diha nga area... katong gaisano country mall pa lang diha.. ang traffic kay ok kaayo.. karong naa nay UC grabe na ka problema ang traffic diha... they should have widened the road first before giving permits to build buildings in front sa gaisano country mall....

[duke pikaso]

for me, mas maau na ireroute ang uban jeep na muagi dinha sa banilad.. instead na muagi sila sa banilad, adto na ipaagi sa cabangcalan, mugawas sa may ayala na dapit.. kalimot ko sa name sa road.. pero kanang muagi sa sarosa hotel, paseo dapit..

then number coding.. dili paagion ang private vehicles dinha sa specified area kung asa grabe ang volume sa sasakyan.. mkahasol sa private, pero daghan maka benefit..

road widening.. maau ni xa, pero astang hasol kaau while gitrabaho.. pas pas unta ni mahuman if kani ang solusyon..

proper and STRICT implementation of jeepney stops no stopping/ parking areas.. wa man ning kwenta ni ng mga citom! di pareho sa mmda, mulihok jud ug naa sa tunga sa dalan para muhapsay sa trapiko.. ang mga walay ayo na citom, nagpalandong, nagtxtxt, igo lang maniid ug manakop sa mga mu violate,, which is walay ayo! sayang lang gibayad ana nila.. mga walay kwenta! ...

[rockrhyan1982]

PUJ can accomodate 10-16 persons wyl a private car takes 4-5. dapat private vehicles ang i-control ky mas daghan masud ug tawu ang PUJ kay sa private vehicles na magdagan which cause serious traffics. gamit ang PUJ kaysa private vehicles.peace! :mrgreen:

[eax]

Good Day to ALL,

This is a seemingly railroaded project by the DPWH. There are other alternate solutions better than the flyover. We cannot keep on building flyovers at every city intersection.This is clearly an symptom of poor urban planning. Here is what the Coalition affected by this flyover propose. Please visit this website. Read and understand and make your decision. We are appealing for public support.

http://www.geocities.com/btsc2007/

I think, mao man na sila katong mga grupo ma-affected sa kung naay flyover.

We should also think, na kanang naa sa Banilad flyover is a public interest na siya. Sila, wala na mabuhat ana.

[nab_uang]

i hope they can expedite the construction of the bridge so that the affected businesses will be able to recover back their loses...

[M@rv|n]

PUJ can accomodate 10-16 persons wyl a private car takes 4-5. dapat private vehicles ang i-control ky mas daghan masud ug tawu ang PUJ kay sa private vehicles na magdagan which cause serious traffics. gamit ang PUJ kaysa private vehicles.peace! :mrgreen:

wahehehe korek korek!!! ... ayaw paagia ang mga private vehicle for the mean time