MERGED: South Road Properties (SRP) News, Issues, and Developments

[v-heng]

---

taud2x na sad baya ni gisugdan ug trabaho sah...

[zoters]

na kadugay pa tawn mahuman ani..hehehe

[peewee_toot]

kinsay naay pics sa tunnel? post please.

[UYOGZ]

dili na tinuod nga mahuman ni inig December.. ang tinuod kay March pani mahuman ug ma.agi.an..

dili pud na tinuod nga naay rugby boyz nga mangatulog diha.. pwede pud diay mo maka.agi ug gabi.e diha?? dili man.. usa pud.. higpit man ang security diha.. dili kadali.dali ug sulod diha..

OK??

mana pud ug espalto ang kilid sa CTU/CSCST.. kanang padong exit anang subway...

kong mahuman nani kay saba na gyud kaayo ang kilid sa among eskwelahan..

[PUERTO PRINCESA]

nahilum namn ni run. walay nabuhat si pablo.

[PUERTO PRINCESA]

ang langaw kung makapatong sa cabaw, magsigi gyud na lupadlupad

[elvandesantos]

pag madayon unta ang mga projects sa srp mura raba taga cebu city lng ang mka trabaho ani unta.. apil raba ang mga taga province ani,, backward man au ni si gov oi!

[tikud]

Wla na gisakyan nasad sa Capitol...
Mang lawgaw nasad.

Capitol warns SM on SRP deal
(The Freeman) Updated November 06, 2009 12:00 AM
Sepulveda said that as stated in that complaint, SM should take note, among other reasons why it was filed, that private corporations cannot buy reclaimed lands owned by the government.

The province questioned the “outright purchase” of the 10 hectares by FLI as it was without a sealed bidding.

Also, Garcia contended that the city government cannot sell reclaimed lots without the authority of Congress as stated by the Commonwealth Act No. 141.

Sepulveda said that they are “not discouraging” SM to purchase parcels of the SRP, but it should also take note of the legal procedures upon which FLI has failed to consider.

“We are not against SM, we welcome them. Our unsolicited advice; they should carefully review the situation—the joint venture ordinance, the Supreme Court pronouncement on reclaimed properties. We’re not discouraging them, we are helping them to ensure di mo-violate the same thing we raised against FLI,” he said. — Liv G. Campo/BRP (THE FREEMAN)

I made a DUE DILIGENCE concerning SRP for a 100 hectare development.
With me are documents concerning the development of SRP from Cebu City Gov't.
Contracts with the Bank from Japan and Contracts with Land Bank...

This is the set up,
Nag Loan ang Cebu city Gov't sa bank sa Japan
but Japan will not take the SRP project as collateral but rather made the PHil Gov't as
co-maker instead. So in case Cebu City can't pay the loan, The Phil Gov't will assume the debt
and will Own SRP.. actually kana interest sa SRP padulong ra guihapon na and uban sa Gobyerno/

It is also NOT true SRP cant be sold kay reclaimed lot .. sus pastilan ingon gani sila GGC tag eya sa
pier s Linao Ormoc City nga wala gani to cguro ECC. and SRP na hinoon dili ma baligya...

What is stated in the development of SRP ... The city can sell the lotS as long as the area sold mo balance
the actual cost paid up sa loan. Example if paid up na ug 30% ang Cebu City hall, they can only sell
up to 30% sa total area sa SRP. If the area is more than the paid up area, they can still sell as long as
the revenue generated will be use to PAY up the Loan.
There is a provision however that Cebu City can't sell more than xx% of SRP to individual or corporate entities. THIS IS SO para subsistent pa guihapon ang interest sa city with SRP project dili biyaan.
and also the city is allowed to DONATE SRP LOTS to any govt entity or charitable non stock non profit institutions but not more than xx% of SRP total area.

Capitol should know that SRP is like MEPZ I. Investors can own the lots.
SRP has been declared by the President under Presidential Proclamation as a Special 'EConomic Zone.
Wherein the Cebu City Gov't is the DEveloper and Operator of the zone. Dili congress and mo approve if
in case mo baligya sila. wala na tawon labot ang congress ana.
loslos, Mandaue North Reclamation project kinsa man karon ang tag eya? di ba sharing ang Mandaue ug Developer? then ang developer cge na lang ug baligya.
SRP is even advantageous since 100 % is owned by the City. Pastilan. pero buot mo?

kana bidding bidding in fact is non-sense. Lot prices are assessed according to the valuation
of the property in terms of its accessibility, infra in place, Location and all.
in fact ang ugat sa ila away is because of the VALUATION OF THE PROPERTY kay gusto ra sa Capitol
mo dawat ug straight swap when in fact ang ila yuta full of squaters but ang e swap kay property
sa NRA with higher valuation kay Commercial location.
"mao na kaingon si Mike Rama ug dawat lang kapitol ug limpyo."


ang SRP title na ug limpyo ang papeles.
Duna Tubigan sa SRP, of course with titles pud na diha sa Pond A ug Pond F pero wala sila tuyo
mangilad kay gui declare man gyud ug POND.

kini lang ang dapat nato ma sabtan:
IF CEBU CITY GOV'T WILL CEASE TO PAY UP THE LOAN, PHILIPPINE GOV'T WILL
AUTOMATICALLY TAKE OVER THE PROPERTY AND WILL CONTINUE TO PAY THE BANK OF JAPAN.
Still SRP would still be there and within the CEBu cITY'S JURISDICTION WHICH WE AS CEBUANOS
WOULD STILL ENJOY WHATEVER THE NATIONAL GOV'T WILL DO WITH THE PROJECT.
mao bitaw ang SRP Coastal Road is maintained and funded by the National Gov't since the development
of SRP is a joint project between the National and the Cebu City Gov't.

Kinsa man tonto mag himo ug SRP project unya dili ma baligya?
Kinsa man tonto mo palit ug hunasan unya dili ma gamitan?
Kinsa man tonto mo PALIT ug fish pond unya wala isda? aw duna na ron kay nag release na man ug fishlings.
Kinsa man tonto mo pa approve ug pHp600M PROJECT UNYA MO BAYAD UG PhP900M?

Capitol should be charged with economic sabotage.... dili ang Capitol mo kiha sa Cebu City Govt
If suko ang capitol gui hold ila pang kuarta sa CIUDAD project sa banilad. Mag buot diay mo?

[LytSlpr]

It is also NOT true SRP cant be sold kay reclaimed lot .. sus pastilan ingon gani sila GGC tag eya sa
pier s Linao Ormoc City nga wala gani to cguro ECC. and SRP na hinoon dili ma baligya...

basta sila (Garcia) na gani, exempted sila. gasalig ra sila nga gamay ang Ormoc unya wala kaayo ma-issue. if i were tomas, i will open up this issue too!

Capitol should know that SRP is like MEPZ I. Investors can own the lots.
SRP has been declared by the President under Presidential Proclamation as a Special 'EConomic Zone.
Wherein the Cebu City Gov't is the DEveloper and Operator of the zone. Dili congress and mo approve if
in case mo baligya sila. wala na tawon labot ang congress ana. loslos

This goes back to my original point about the SRP in a separate thread. Sayang na lang ang pagka topnotcher ni Dodong Pablo John sa bar. Mao bitaw naka ingon ko nga PURE PANGLAWGAW ra gyud ng iyaha on national TV. Ang mga tawo nga edukado mo ingon siguro buanga aning tawhana, siya man nuon ang nibabag sa kausbawan sa ilang lugar. The Presidential Proclamation encompasses everything, that is the special powers of the president.

BTW, ayaw anang loslos boss kay maayo kaayo si Gwen ana, pangutan-a si Glenn.

kini lang ang dapat nato ma sabtan:
IF CEBU CITY GOV'T WILL CEASE TO PAY UP THE LOAN, PHILIPPINE GOV'T WILL
AUTOMATICALLY TAKE OVER THE PROPERTY AND WILL CONTINUE TO PAY THE BANK OF JAPAN.
Still SRP would still be there and within the CEBu cITY'S JURISDICTION WHICH WE AS CEBUANOS
WOULD STILL ENJOY WHATEVER THE NATIONAL GOV'T WILL DO WITH THE PROJECT.
mao bitaw ang SRP Coastal Road is maintained and funded by the National Gov't since the development
of SRP is a joint project between the National and the Cebu City Gov't.

If we follow your logic, though it is a Joint-Venture (bisa'g baligya gud) and not a government reclaimed lot, wala di'ay right nga I-close sa Ayala ang AsiaTown IT park to the public for whatever reason kay government lots gud na. (nga inilog from private entities through technical land-grabbing).

So kung naa man gani right ang Ayala mo close sa IT Park compound, then naa sad right si Tomas mo-close sa SRP.

Maayo pa si Tomas, nag-reclaim ug yuta, wala nangilog. Wa man gani na pahawa-a ni Tomas ang mga residents sa Barrio Luz because if I remember right, then President Magsaysay declared it as a relocation site bisan nag tong-tong na sila in a very prime lot. I don't know if it was a temporary relocation or not though. I also don't know if some settlers were able to get titles in that lot but with titles or not, they should do something about barrio luz that is beneficial to both the government and the settlers because the government cannot just move people just like that in the name of progress.

Sa ato pa, kung ang progress, ma-abot na relocation site sa pulang bato sa Talamban which is not very far from happening, pahawa-n na pud sila ngadto?

Mark my words, kung usa ka Garcia na gani ang mag lingkod sa Cebu City Hall, haros gyud na ug pamaligya ang Barrio Luz ug mga Friar Lands gamitan lang na ug smooth legal maneuver and technicality para "ma-legal" just like what they did to the original owners of Lahug Airport now AsiaTown IT Park and Waterfront Hotel.

Capitol should be charged with economic sabotage.... dili ang Capitol mo kiha sa Cebu City Govt
If suko ang capitol gui hold ila pang kuarta sa CIUDAD project sa banilad. Mag buot diay mo?

MAO GYUD! If gidayon pa to ang landswap that is agreeable to the terms of the city which was only fair, then maybe the city could have let them "slide" with Ciudad's zoning issue. Unsaon ta man, swapang man kaayo ang mga Garcia. Ingon siguro ni Tomas, straight swap? No way Gwen!


It is just very perplexing and funny at the same time to think how Cebu's LGU is SO MUCH into the real estate business.

[dodongnaki]

@tikud
SALAMAT KAAYO SA INFO.

ug about sa imong question nga kinsa man tonto? akoy tubag: GARCIA!