c gwen nangilog sa candy ni tomas wkakekeeOriginally Posted by kit_cebu
cge ra laway sa kalamboan sa cebu city
Results 1,311 to 1,320 of 2400
-
11-06-2009, 08:24 AM #1311Banned User
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 3,061
-
11-06-2009, 08:48 AM #1312C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 5,556
if capitol wants development and more jobs let the city handle the transactions....
-
11-06-2009, 08:51 AM #1313Banned User
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Gender
- Posts
- 643
dili bro, si "darna" ra ang ganahan mo ilog sa candy.... Angay na siguro ni kasohan og economic sabotage ni "Captain Barbel Tomas"... Originally Posted by kit_cebu
-
11-06-2009, 08:52 AM #1314C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Gender
- Posts
- 5,218
haha, this is outright funny! if the people in capitol are hustlers, unsa na lang na sila sy, tan, gokongwei, etc?
i don't think the garcias are smarter than these chinese tycoons. if the sy's will push through with putting an SM in SRP, that means that nobody can intimidate them even in national government.
i know for a fact that the ayalas are not suppose to put up Trinoma in EDSA-QC but they were able to put it off. i don't need to say HOW.
gusto siguro sa capitol nga ang mga ayala ang makapalit/tukod kay mao man ilang suki sa mga yuta.
-
11-06-2009, 08:59 AM #1315C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Posts
- 1,923
the Gotianun's and the Sy's know a lot better than the Garcias w/ their saliva-froothing Capitol consultant Sepulveda when it comes to property development...why don't they mind their own Balili property
-
11-06-2009, 09:02 AM #1316C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Gender
- Posts
- 5,218
can Cebu City Hall collect parking and toll fees in SRP?
YES! because it is not a national project or highway.
Tomas can very well implement toll fees in SRP but he did not do it para di ma-ipit ang mga mga sugbuanon including the people from the province.
then why did he do it with CCMC? because he knows that there is an equally poorly run hospital whichs VSMMC.
will it be lawful for capitol to collect toll fees for Mactan bridge 1 & 2?
IMO, no because it is a national government project.
-
11-06-2009, 09:02 AM #1317C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Gender
- Posts
- 3,711
inahak jud ning mga tawhana oi wa jud lingaw igo ra jud magsamok-samok.
-
11-06-2009, 09:06 AM #1318C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Gender
- Posts
- 5,218
ingon siguro sa mga Sy, "Unsa man, sukol mo mga Garcia ug hinutdanay ug kwarta ug binayad sa Supreme Court ug Justice Secretary?"
if the Garcias, have half a brain, then they should back off!
the game is not about justice, it is about business!
-
11-06-2009, 09:09 AM #1319C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 8,744
"among other reasons why it was filed, that private corporations cannot buy reclaimed lands owned by the government."
Kinsa to sueto ug balaod diha unsa mani siya ...
Diba ang SRP is registered with PEZA .. unsa may problema ani nga dili puede ang private corporations mo owned of gov. reclaimed land.
-
11-06-2009, 09:11 AM #1320C.I.A.
- Join Date
- Jan 2003
- Gender
- Posts
- 5,218
Originally Posted by amingb
if there is even a law on paper, it is only worth to wipe someone's a$$.
let's just say, there is such a law. then this is not the first time the government sold lots to private entities/capitalists.
but you know what, they will bombard you with legal technicalities. mao na kung ordinaryo'ng tawo ra ka, wa gyud kay mahims.
kanang balaod, applicable ra na sa pobre and/or wala'y connections.
Reply With Quote Advertisement
Similar Threads |
|
|