AMD or INTEL

[CrasHBURN]

---

AMD isnt dali mo init. Intel is super hot too. think about 50 - 60 deg C? my AMD systems doesnt go as hot as that!

In terms of temperature/stability, same ra gyud sila. Depende ra gyud on how it is assembled and configured.

[Ian]

Right on the Big Buck CrasHBURN.. It is really true jud flanker.. and please don't set your thoughts on:

"INTEL <--- i guess is the best around processor?i think... advantage nya kai stable then dli kau mo init"

Again, i should defend my AMD.. Stability you meant isnt an advantage, mainly because both AMD or INTEL are capable of great stability and reliability. Like CrasHBURN said, it all depends on how it was assembled and configured.

[jonz]

AMD isnt dali mo init. Intel is super hot too. think about 50 - 60 deg C? my AMD systems doesnt go as hot as that!

In terms of temperature/stability, same ra gyud sila. Depende ra gyud on how it is assembled and configured.

i agree... i have a Intel PII b4 its reli hot... pwede lutoan ug itlog... it even reaches 70deg in normal setup..currently im using P4 2.6C... bugnaw rman ang temp.... i try 2 tun it 24 hrs... highest temp of the processor reaches 38deg and MB temp is 35dge.i only have 1 in and 3 out fans... what if AMD runs 24hrs and cpu cooler gamiton ky kna ra apil sa procesor package...

[muzikfreakah]

Ferl: Beor is exactly right about everything. This is just a big marketing game. Its really plain and simple, if you have a 30-50-100k Budget, you will get the best PC with an AMD. HEAT is never a problem for those people who know how to setup there PC correctly and HEAT CAN BE a problem for those who dont, AMD or INTEL.

When AMD introduced itself in the market, there were so many people who didnt know to how to correctly set it up, which resulted to heat problems(most of them unintentional overclocks kay sayop ug settings sa BIOS), thus coming up with the conclusion that AMD is hot. Well, all I can say is AMD is definitely a "HOT" product. 90% of ARCtech Sales are AMD sytems, all our recommended sytems are AMD systems since budget wise, you get your money's worth really, and who wouldnt want that, right?

[Ian]

AMD Processors should not be treated inferior because of heat.. compatibility issue or etc.. FYI, Windows XP, an operating system by Microsoft decided to put "XP" as an extension because they used AMD Athlon™ XP Processor on their development.

AMD should be treated otherwise..

[CrasHBURN]

I agree with Thaoke Boss Amo Ryan@ARCtech..

[CrasHBURN]

Ian: I'm not sure with your Microsoft-AMD-XP info.. Windows XP was released before Palomino (code name for Athlon XP). I think its the other way around. AMD named their processors as XP because, it runs best with WinXP.

[Ian]

It was a sake of promoting AMD Athlon™ XP boss.. But then again, it is not true.. Windows XP (Experience) while Athlon™ XP (Extra Performance)..

[CrasHBURN]

I was refering to AMD's promotional statements just like what you said earlier, but yours was yours, not AMD's. "AMD Athlon XP, Performance for Windows XP" - found in some AMD poster. Anyway that solves the issue.

OT: In marketing/promoting products, let us use as much advantages of the said item as possible. But, the truth has its limits, dont go beyond truth. Especially when you are trying to give negative thoughts about its competitor.

[AMD_infinium05]

XP = Extra Power....