
Originally Posted by
porbidaman
Hahay again the typical Siodenz, molikay napud basta pangayoan ug ebidensya.
mangita as usual ug palusot basta malangay-langay lang jud ug hatag sa ebidensya.
Kanus-a man ka mohatag ug proof siodz kai excited nako moverify? Hehehehe...
Nehatag nabitaw ko sa criteria, shoot na siodz
kai eksakto jud si Mikoyan nga daghan kang tuyok-tuyok nga posts.

WOW self denial.. I just Summarize to you the FLOW of our conversation nya IBALIK nsad nimu imung Reply nga HAHAY?
You did Not Deny or Affirm Nor Argue nor continue on my Post regarding our conversation about sa imung SEE, TOUCH, Ug HEAR as the ULTIMATE Criteria of EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE.. nya reply lang ug hahay... hehe
I dont need to EXPOUND again, You can Reply with your Hahay 1000 times but you Still cannot Deny nga imung GISUGDAN nga ARGUMENT DILI na ka SUSTINER sa atung conversation... and people here Knows that...
Cge lang palusot ug ebendensya nya iyang ARGUMENT sa Criteria sa Empirical Evidence dili gani ka Sustiner, Di ka padayun sa Discussion..
Deep in yourself YOU KNOW regarding your STAND right now, You can LIE to yourself Countless times Here in Forum BUT its a different thing when you are ALONE THINKING about what you Believed in.
Good Luck...