
Originally Posted by
shayneyap
WAAAAAAAAA ang pasabot sa line sa article nga
"they could not determine if the injuries were inflicted by Montecillo or by the suspect, himself," - kay ang mga injuries man
SA SUSPECT dili sa babae nga namatay. Read the sentence before ana. Diba gidala daw nila ang suspect sa sotto kay NAGKA INJURIES POD.
"Soledad (SUSPECT), however, was first brought to Vicente Sotto Memorial Medical Center (VSMMC) after he also sustained injuries." SPO4 Alex Dacua of the Cebu City Police Office's Homicide Section said they could not determine if the injuries were inflicted by Montecillo or by the suspect, himself, because he refused to cooperate with them.
LOL ayaw namo pag lalis 
Pag sure oi. Murag ikaw moy wala kasabot sa akong ipaibot. Akong i-explain for your benefit ha.. from a point of view of a BsCrim Grad.
First of all, ingon ang police wla sila kabalo kung ang injuries sa "suspect" kay inflicted by himself or sa "victim" kay tungod uncooperative ang suspect. 2ndly, ingon cya nga "they couldn't determine yet what prompted Soledad to kill his girlfriend" now... how come sure kaayo cla nga si soledad jud nagpatay sa iyang gf (although obvious kaayo) when in the first place uncooperative man kaha cya meaning they didn't get any confession, they didn't get any statements from him, etc. pero sa first statement kay unsure sila sa injuries sa guy kay tungod uncooperative siya. Make sense?
Akong point is.. isn't a suspect presumed innocent unless prven guilty
in a court of law? Panawagan ni sa mga police nga pataka lang ug yawit. Kung maka abogado nig maayo kaayo ning suspect tiklo ning polisa.
Wla gihapon ka gets? pangutana lage panagsa haron mag abot atong radar. D magpataka ug sabot ha.