MERGED: All About Gloria Arroyo - Past, Present, Future

[bearish]

---

wala pay napakanaug na hukom mao wala silay tulobagon iho. Kung ni file palang ni sila ug kaso sauna..dili unta ma abot ani nga punto nga mag away na hinoon ang SC ug EXE.

Ang SC igo ra ni stand kung unsa ang sakto..illegal ang WLO..unsa paman ila gusto mahitabo?

kay unsa diay gusto sa SC? nga ipasaka dayon ang kaso bisan wa pa mahan-ay ug tarong ang mga ebidensya? aron makalusot na hinoon? Watch List Order gani iha, aron mananghid sila sa DOJ before sila mo larga. dili naman ni matter of constitutional or not. be practical lang. a matter naman ni kung kinsa ka alyado nimo diha sa SC.

Kana kung ma proven guilty si GMA. Pro wala paman so innocent pa siya iho..ayaw I short cut ang balaud..

kay ngano kung di pa proven guilty, pasabot nimo gawasnon gihapon sila? you have to know nga non-bailable ang mga cases nga ilang atobangon. mag tagongtong sila sa prisohan once ma file na iha.

Unsay ligon? Hehehe..kung ligon pana hagbay ra unta na na file ang case..now sa ilang gipakita karon dili naman hinoon sila kasaligan kay pati ang SC ila man g baliwala..

depende kung unsa intention nimo. kung dali-dalion lang nimo ug file for the sake of filing para lang ingnon aw, pwede kaayo ifile kaniadto ra. pero gi tan-aw man na maayo iha, aron ma determine kung unsay tukma nga kaso ipasaka kung mo jive ba sa mga circumstances ug mga evidences. kung tinarong gyod, mao gyod nay sakto buhaton.

Sama sa akong g sulti..unsa man ang ila tulubagon nga wala man pa silay kaso sa court nga maka prove nga guilty sila sa mga accusation? Kamo maka ingon lang mo nga guilty siya kay mao mana ang inyong nakita sat v ug uban pang trial by publicity nga gibuhat sa admin.. sakto ba d I na mga ato lang hugahan ang isa ka tao base sa media o txt lang?

mao lagi nga huwat2x lang sila diha. stay put lang sila kay later on they'll stay put in jail.

[AlbertCruz]

@hulagway. speak in english. the person your addressing is a fag that can't understand bisaya that's why its always false assumptions that are coming out of him

[AlbertCruz]

man, can you not do that 'txt' style of writing thing? it's annoying! also, tell me what's contradictory about that statement so i can help you.

Like I said. Your implying GMA is faking it and wants to escape now. So... even if your right, which is unlikely, what makes you think her assets will still be intact after escaping now rather than just simply disappearing directly

So the logic that you pride yourself so much is broken

and most people don't a **** if your annoyed because your whining just shows how much of a self-centered jackass you are

[bearish]

so are you an insider or did you get your FACTS from text messages like De Lima?

kung unsa ka mao sad ko. ayaw pagpaka aron ingnon sad nga naa kay FACTS diha. kay ang FACTS tua na ron sa DOJ ug wa diri nato.

[zairon1988]

kung unsa ka mao sad ko. ayaw pagpaka aron ingnon sad nga naa kay FACTS diha. kay ang FACTS tua na ron sa DOJ ug wa diri nato.

g lomloman sa DOJ ang mga FACTS ?

[hulagway]

kay unsa diay gusto sa SC? nga ipasaka dayon ang kaso bisan wa pa mahan-ay ug tarong ang mga ebidensya? aron makalusot na hinoon? Watch List Order gani iha, aron mananghid sila sa DOJ before sila mo larga. dili naman ni matter of constitutional or not. be practical lang. a matter naman ni kung kinsa ka alyado nimo diha sa SC.

im talking about the TRO nga g pagawas sa SC..dili ng kaso nga i file pa sa DOJ..
hehehe

tanawa ra..wala paman d i klaro nga ebidensay unya ng WLO na sila..sakto bana?

kay ngano kung di pa proven guilty, pasabot nimo gawasnon gihapon sila? you have to know nga non-bailable ang mga cases nga ilang atobangon. mag tagongtong sila sa prisohan once ma file na iha.

pag sure diha uy..alagan na ug di nga wala paman kaso laban sa mga arroyo..

depende kung unsa intention nimo. kung dali-dalion lang nimo ug file for the sake of filing para lang ingnon aw, pwede kaayo ifile kaniadto ra. pero gi tan-aw man na maayo iha, aron ma determine kung unsay tukma nga kaso ipasaka kung mo jive ba sa mga circumstances ug mga evidences. kung tinarong gyod, mao gyod nay sakto buhaton.

pag sure uy..kang naa na evedence file dayon..kay sama sa g sulti ni noynoy katong ng campaing na siya nga naa daw daghan nga evidence laban kay gma ug pag siya ang ma president filelan dayon niya ug kaso..mao na iya priority..na unsa ba ba nga hapit naman mo 2 years wala paman klaro..

mao lagi nga huwat2x lang sila diha. stay put lang sila kay later on they'll stay put in jail.

hehehe..pwde d i na sa atong balaud? nga maski wala pa kay sala o wala pa na proven nga sadan ka i hold ka? pag sure diha dong uyy..

[tylerdurden]

@hulagway

1. a crime is a crime whether it was legally prosecuted or not. everybody and their dog knows what the arroyos did. it's only people like you (or should i say employees?) that want to stay blind to it.

2. the arroyos are clearly faking their condition. this is again another case where you refuse to see (or continue to prove loyalty to your employer?)

3. having an immediate boss does not mean being immediately beholden to that boss. it might be the case that De Lima has enough guts to stand on what is right and not bow to the corruption of the SC. this is probably difficult for you to understand considering the ethics of your idol and munting princessa but some people actually have a moral ground to stand on.

call me bogo if you will but at least my mind is empty and willing to take in information. yours on the other hand is full of ****.

[AlbertCruz]

g lomloman sa DOJ ang mga FACTS ?

dili, basig gigutom si De Lima ug iyang gikaon mao na tanang maggawas na run sa iyang baba to the media can be considered as evidence

[zairon1988]

dili, basig gigutom si De Lima ug iyang gikaon mao na tanang maggawas na run sa iyang baba to the media can be considered as evidence

bag-o na cguro ron..ang taga media na ang jury og maoy mo convict ni tita glo

[hulagway]

@hulagway

1. a crime is a crime whether it was legally prosecuted or not. everybody and their dog knows what the arroyos did. it's only people like you (or should i say employees?) that want to stay blind to it.

unless its proven in court that's how law works in the Philippines

2. the arroyos are clearly faking their condition. this is again another case where you refuse to see (or continue to prove loyalty to your employer?)

again don't be and idiot..you think your good than those at st lukes?

3. having an immediate boss does not mean being immediately beholden to that boss. it might be the case that De Lima has enough guts to stand on what is right and not bow to the corruption of the SC. this is probably difficult for you to understand considering the ethics of your idol and munting princessa but some people actually have a moral ground to stand on.

hehehe..dili ko katoo nga ingani d i ka ka bogo..

call me bogo if you will but at least my mind is empty and willing to take in information. yours on the other hand is full of ****.

infrmation from TXT? indeed your mind is empty.