If we follow the reasoning na for tax computations and insurance benificiaries ang rason , it doe snot hold water. Its a weak excuse to say the least na I will leave the will to my same *** lover.
...
Type: Posts; User: SPRINGFIELD_XD_40
If we follow the reasoning na for tax computations and insurance benificiaries ang rason , it doe snot hold water. Its a weak excuse to say the least na I will leave the will to my same *** lover.
...
Guys and gals ..... be mindful lang when addressing your concerns towards the LGBT specially to those who subscribes here .
My point is , they should be respected also as much as we are .
Point...
Let me ask you this , among the " insert " , why did you not include gender as well ? Unless you are referring it under "any other classification" then I would understand that indeed your options are...
That would be irrelevant if we resort to DEFINITIONS.
In your case , then might as well amend the definition of MARRIAGE regardless of what year it is.
Like I said in the question , why is it...
Why would it not make the cut ?
YES to CIVIL UNION.
NO to GAY MARRIAGE.
Uso na bitaw na NELATCH karon . Pirmero ra luod bradex ?