Do you support women as priests?

[carmicaeld]

Quote: Originally Posted by regnauld That's besides the point but then the Gospel of Philip is as authentic as the four gospels! Now, would you only include ther 4 gospels because there are only 4 elements in the universe. Crazy, isn't it ?

so, according to the Roman Catholic Church, is it canonical?

[carmicaeld]

Quote: Originally Posted by regnauld Care to elaborate why women cannot be priests? Don't you think there is NO POSSIBLITY that women cannot be priests?

if you care to read some of my posts in this thread, you might find an answer.

[regnauld]

Quote: Originally Posted by carmicaeld so, according to the Roman Catholic Church, is it canonical?

That is according to your church and your church cannot MONOPOLIZE THE WHOLE TRUTH!

BTW, I don't belong in your Roman Church. I am a Catholic in ESSENCE but not Roman.

[regnauld]

Quote: Originally Posted by carmicaeld if you care to read some of my posts in this thread, you might find an answer.

Is it based on the TRUTH? Your belief is just a belief and no religion or belief is higher than TRUTH.

[carmicaeld]

Quote: Originally Posted by regnauld That is according to your church and your church cannot MONOPOLIZE THE WHOLE TRUTH! BTW, I don't belong in your Roman Church. I am a Catholic in ESSENCE but not Roman.

you still didn't answer my question. so, according to the roman catholic church,
is it canonical?

[carmicaeld]

Quote: Originally Posted by regnauld Is it based on the TRUTH? Your belief is just a belief and no religion or belief is higher than TRUTH.

so, sir, on what grounds can you assert that what you, yourself, say is the TRUTH?

[regnauld]

Quote: Originally Posted by carmicaeld you still didn't answer my question. so, according to the roman catholic church, is it canonical?

Nasuko ka bradix?

Mura man ka atty. your honor with low EQ but high IQ!

Answer your honor: According to your church and religion, NO!

[regnauld]

Quote: Originally Posted by carmicaeld so, sir, on what grounds can you assert that what you, yourself, say is the TRUTH?

The TRUTH that I assert is that your belief is not grounded on TRUTH for it is just a belief and nothing esle.

[carmicaeld]

Quote: Originally Posted by regnauld Nasuko ka bradix? Mura man ka atty. your honor with low EQ but high IQ! Answer your honor: According to your church and religion, NO!

i was just wondering why you couldn't answer one simple question that spanned six posts. so, i had a conclusion that you can't read some parts of my question, so i decided to make the font larger, so you could read better.

here's another theory: maybe you have a tendency to avoid "certain" questions and bombard the asking party with all those "esoteric" rants and "sacred feminist" lolwuts as to mask something (which i do not want to speculate what).

[carmicaeld]

Quote: Originally Posted by regnauld The TRUTH that I assert is that your belief is not grounded on TRUTH for it is just a belief and nothing esle.

ah, so i also assert TRUTH that your TRUTH is not grounded on TRUTH for it is just a belief and nothing esle (else?)

[regnauld]

Quote: Originally Posted by carmicaeld i was just wondering why you couldn't answer one simple question that spanned six posts. so, i had a conclusion that you can't read some parts of my question, so i decided to make the font larger, so you could read better. here's another theory: maybe you have a tendency to avoid "certain" questions and bombard the asking party with all those "esoteric" rants and "sacred feminist" lolwuts as to mask something (which i do not want to speculate what).

Your honor I already answered you according to your church and religion. Isn't that hard to comprehend your honor?

I see and I understand your honor that you had to enlarge the font and I hope you were not shouting I mean raging with fire! Relax your honor, mahina ang kalaban!

Now, If I would ask you this question your honor, are you aware that Irenaeus chose the ONLY 4 gospels because there were only 4 elements or forces in the universe?

[regnauld]

Quote: Originally Posted by carmicaeld ah, so i also assert TRUTH that your TRUTH is not grounded on TRUTH for it is just a belief and nothing esle (else?)

Maybe.

Now, if I would ask you, is there is no possibility that women can become priests because GOD said it so? Is that grounded on UNIVERSAL TRUTH or your Religious TRUTH because your church or religion said it so?

[carmicaeld]

Quote: Originally Posted by regnauld Your honor I already answered you according to your church and religion. Isn't that hard to comprehend your honor? I see and I understand your honor that you had to enlarge the font and I hope you were not shouting I mean raging with fire! Relax your honor, mahina ang kalaban! Now, If I would ask you this question your honor, are you aware that Irenaeus chose the ONLY the 4 gospels because there were only 4 elements or forces in the universe?

if i was angry, following the rules of the interwebz, i would have unleashed the power of CAPS LOCK.

now on your question, which i can read clearly, and i will answer honestly without any explanation whatsoever to disprove your question(argument hidden behind the question):

yes.

[carmicaeld]

Quote: Originally Posted by regnauld Maybe. Now, if I would ask you, is there is no possibility that women can become priests because GOD said it so? Is that grounded on UNIVERSAL TRUTH or your Religious TRUTH because your church or religion said it so?

it is grounded on the Roman Catholic Church's UNIVERSAL TRUTH. so, your grounds for letting women participate as priests based on your TRUTH, or the Esoteric UNIVERSAL truth?

what's the point in debating which is the UNIVERSAL TRUTH or what not? you can argue all day that your TRUTH is UNIVERSAL and I can disagree anyway. this goes vice versa.

unless you are under the Roman Catholic Church's TRUTH, then what's the point in moving for women priests?

[regnauld]

Quote: Originally Posted by carmicaeld if i was angry, following the rules of the interwebz, i would have unleashed the power of CAPS LOCK. now on your question, which i can read clearly, and i will answer honestly without any explanation whatsoever to disprove your question(argument hidden behind the question): yes.

And what do you think your honor, would you say that is crazy choosing ONLY the 4 gospels because there are only 4 elements in the universe? Do you think that's LOGICAL your honor?

BTW, when I suse CAPSLOCK it is just to emphasize words unlike you mokalit lang ug kalami!

Have you noticed your honor that I use the CAPSLOCK consistently in mosty of my posts?