Gods view on evolution ?

[cromagnon]

Now adays we can see millions of fossils that proves darwins theory.

but what is the religions point of view on this.?

Research also shows the difinite discription of the universe.

is the creation story in genesis just a representation.?

[chad_tukes]

there are a significant number of people from the religionist camp that accepts the idea of evolution and sees genesis as a symbolic sequence of events.

[cromagnon]

so accept cla ug evolution and the facts that the universe is 15 billion yrs. , so as the big bang.

[chad_tukes]

Quote: Originally Posted by cromagnon so accept cla ug evolution and the facts that the universe is 15 billion yrs. , so as the big bang.

some do, some don't. it's actually kind of divided. hence, the war of evolutionism vs. creationism.

[kebotDiNaMute]

seems to me a fairy tale... WEEE! Im watching and im enjoying. Exclusively for Entertainment purposes... you must watch BBC Dinosaur too, it looks so real, and the BBC Universe by Sam Niel. Its nice... Just dont force yourself to believe, its different story...

[cromagnon]

so i how old do u think is the earth kebots?

[Jober]

Quote: Originally Posted by kebotDiNaMute seems to me a fairy tale... WEEE! Im watching and im enjoying. Exclusively for Entertainment purposes... you must watch BBC Dinosaur too, it looks so real, and the BBC Universe by Sam Niel. Its nice... Just dont force yourself to believe, its different story...

mas fairy tale ang Creation. exclusively for children. dinosaurs did exist,go ask your creationist scientists. pagka totyo.

note: go down ko sa imong levle kebot ha para ma lingaw pod ka. i will feed your hunger for bashing and insults. tira noy.

[The_Child]

just because creationism is non-factual, doesnt mean one must embrace evolution theory as THE theory.

[brownprose]

Quote: Originally Posted by The_Child just because creationism is non-factual, doesnt mean one must embrace evolution theory as THE theory.

huh?! are you suggesting sir that we should believe in non-factual things as creationism?

[The_Child]

just because creationism is non-factual, it does not mean that we have to embrace is alternative evolution theory as THE theory.

[HALIKniHUDAS]

Quote: Originally Posted by The_Child just because creationism is non-factual, doesnt mean one must embrace evolution theory as THE theory.

taka man lang ni nga statement. Rational man must look for rational answers. don't push your idea on the people that finds creationism ridiculous.

It is THE theory.

[HALIKniHUDAS]

Quote: Originally Posted by The_Child just because creationism is non-factual, it does not mean that we have to embrace is alternative evolution theory as THE theory.

are you suggesting nga dili ta maghonahona? awooooo.

[brownprose]

Quote: Originally Posted by The_Child just because creationism is non-factual, it does not mean that we have to embrace is alternative evolution theory as THE theory.

sorry, but this is even more ridiculous sir. so, do you know of any particular theory sir more factual than evolution?

[The_Child]

just because creationism is stupid as a scientific theory, it does not mean, that we are bound to believe in evolutionary theory.



btw, is there a gradation of factuality, to refer to something as MORE factual?

[HALIKniHUDAS]

Quote: Originally Posted by The_Child just because creationism is stupid as a scientific theory, it does not mean, that we are bound to believe in evolutionary theory.

nagka anam man ka walay sense ang imong statement. kasabot ka kong unsa ng scientific theory? don't fall for the trap nga its only a theory.