Comments on Former president NOYNOY AQUINO.

[æRLO]

---

^ 2 decades ago.. nya di ka malain ana nga karon pa ni kiha si Syjuco?

basaha sad ang article jack, ayaw lang ang title.

Exposed by quake
In the complaint, Syjuco said the building’s questionable structural integrity and defects were shown following a 5.7-magnitude earthquake that hit Iloilo in February 2012.
He said that no other building was badly damaged except for the Hall of Justice which was why the regional trial courts, the offices of the clerks of court, the Philippine Mediation Center, the Iloilo Provincial Prosecutor’s Office, Iloilo City Prosecutor’s Office, and the Public Attorneys’ Office (PAO) decided to vacate the building.

Drilon sued for plunder | Inquirer News

If d pa kaayo klaro ang dysfunction sa government before aning series of events, I'm sure karun klaro najud. Then again, the government is a reflection of the society it governs. What a forsaken place.

[wak_wak]

i guess kung ibalik nato sa panahon ni madam gloria mas worst pa cguro ang numbers ani.. karun pa naka audit ug maayo ang COA, before PNoy mura walay gamit ning COA..

anyways pro admin is a pro admin, anti is anti bisag unsa pa mahitabo..

[hulagway]

abi man nako ug ngkalisud ang PILIPINAS pagka daghan man d i ug kwarta...million u billion ang g hisgutan...
pagka daghan unta ang mahimo aning kwartaha kugn gigamit lang sa tarong.....


____________________________________
Decline ug WENT DOWN..anyone?

[EZRA]

... that's the reason why Filipino politicians spend Millions during the elections .. the returns are exponential.

[jack_bauer_v2]

haha.. basaha sa philstar dba didto ninyo ma kit.an nga decades ago pa na g.build ang hall of justice unya dili ang DOJ ang implementing agency kung dili and DPWH... haha

imagine justice secretary pas Drilon.. panahon pa man ng mampor.. bwahahaha

di ba kaha na apil sa 20 yr proscription in crimina case sah?haha

Went down ang utok doy... pgka toytoy..

@aerlo: g.certify na sd na sa engineers sa DPWH nga structurally sound and building.. nya kinsa may namakak ani rn?

[lecreigh]

si pichay ai.. mao diay grabe kaau to xa ka gasto sa election sauna..

nwei, about PNoy's administration, i dont believe in him since the beginning. im not at all shocked that jinggoy said that about corona because that has definitely crossed my mind (he was in such a hurry to kick out corona together with delima.. hahais) and that MNLF in mindanao, it still reeks of conspiracy to me... this is just my opinion ha. but i dont believe in pnoy jud. bottomline.

[Rakizta]

Who’s afraid of Janet Napoles?

Fairly evident is that Justice Secretary Leila de Lima, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales and Senate President Franklin Drilon, all allies of Noynoy Aquino, do not want Janet Napoles to testify before the Senate, as roadblocks were put up in the Senate, first by De Lima, who suddenly “studied” the Ombudsman’s law on confidentiality, which is really not her business, but obviously fed to her by the Ombudsman, and even Drilon.
As for Drilon, he echoed what De Lima had claimed as her excuse not to present her witnesses before the Senate blue ribbon committee — which was Carpio’s excuse, too.


Quick as a wink, Drilon wrote the Ombudsman for her “opinion” on the presence of Napoles before the Senate, which is quite unprecedented in the Senate’s history, even as Drilon claimed that the Ombudsman, being a constitutional office, must be respected.
Hell. None of these senators today bothered about “respecting” the Ombudsman’s Office when it was headed by resigned Merceditas Gutierrez. They did not even bother to write her on her opinion on the cases against disgraced Gen. Carlos Garcia, even when the case was already ongoing as well as the Senate hearing.
Garcia, at that time was being prosecuted, yet Congress summoned him and had him appear before it.
Yet all too suddenly, there were Drilon, De Lima and Carpio-Morales, invoking the confidentiality law, with the Ombudsman even claiming that. In her letter that, based on Rule V, Section 2 of the Ombudsman Rules of Procedure “no publicity shall be made of matters which may adversely affect national security or public interest, prejudice the safety of witnesses or the disposition of the case, or unduly expose persons complained against to ridicule or public censure.”


So what did De Lima, her witnesses, and yes, even Drilon, the Noynoy mouthpieces and also their reliable yellow media do all that time, before the Senate blue ribbon held its hearings, if not have those so-called witnesses and the yellow media accuse, try and convict by publicity the non-allies of Noynoy and the Liberal Party? But today, the claim of the three — Drilon, Morales and De Lima — is that confidentiality has to be upheld, citing an inferior law to the Senate constitutional rules and law, both of which have been upheld by the Supreme Court.
Just what are they afraid of, by having Napoles testify before the Senate?
Well, perhaps, they are not sure of what Napoles will be saying, as there may have been a deal inked between Noynoy and his aides, and Janet Napoles as yet has not been implemented, such as perhaps, an assurance that she would be a state witness who would moreover be given full immunity from suit, or that the cases against her on the alleged kidnapping case filed by Benhur Luy would be dropped at the least, or at most, her case against Luy would prosper.


It is likely that if she testifies before the Senate, she would be proclaiming her innocence, in which case, she would not incriminate herself. But if she does appear before the Senate, and becomes a state witness, then if she testifies the way Luy did, she too, would be a perjurer, no different from Luy, whom she accuses of being a perjurer.
What is striking is the fact that the three allies of Noynoy — Drilon, Carpio-Morales and De Lima, have all come up with the same excuse in not having the witnesses testify before the Senate, especially Napoles, which makes a lot of people wonder why they don’t want Napoles summoned to testify before the Senate.
But perhaps, the orders have been given by Malacañang, and as the three are puppets of Noynoy, they must do as he had ordered.


Who


big cover up kaayo .murag naa ni sinabotan jud mga tawhana

[peewee_toot]

Justice Secretary Leila de Lima, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales and Senate President Franklin Drilon, all allies of Noynoy Aquino, do not want Janet Napoles to testify before the Senate,


first statement pa lang daan kadudahan na. daghan mn gd ma pagan kung ilang ipa testify c janet.

nagkurog2x na ang mga buwaya rn. tagbaw pangita og paagi para lang dili ma bulgar kung unsa ang tinuod...

[æRLO]

haha.. basaha sa philstar dba didto ninyo ma kit.an nga decades ago pa na g.build ang hall of justice unya dili ang DOJ ang implementing agency kung dili and DPWH... haha

imagine justice secretary pas Drilon.. panahon pa man ng mampor.. bwahahaha

di ba kaha na apil sa 20 yr proscription in crimina case sah?haha

Went down ang utok doy... pgka toytoy..

@aerlo: g.certify na sd na sa engineers sa DPWH nga structurally sound and building.. nya kinsa may namakak ani rn?

P200-million budget needed for Iloilo Hall of Justice reconstruction | Sun.Star

200m for an unstructurally sound building. +50m for retrofitting, plus there was no known bidding for the project--we don't know who did it, but there is definitely an anomaly. The problem here is he has his name in initiating the project and reparation, it is up to him to answer with his paper-trails (or lack of) in front of the ombudsman.

Instead he ran to the media crying "political harassment" when all he need to do is go to the proper avenue to prove his innocence.

Drillon's camp sure know how to mudsling, but when it's dished to them, they cry foul.

[jack_bauer_v2]

^ the timing of filling is suspect.