Legalize Abortion?

[mannyamador]

Murder of the innocent nicely illustrated below:

DILATION AND EVACUATION ABORTION OF 23 WEEK OLD FETUS

Dilation and Evacuation is a 2nd trimester abortion procedure. For the procedure to take place, the woman's cervix must first be dilated, usually with laminaria, over a two or three day period prior to the abortion. Laminaria sticks are made of sterilized and compressed seaweed that can be inserted into a woman's cervix. Here, they begin expanding from moisture absorption, resulting in an enlarged cervix. When the women returns for the actual abortion to take place, forceps are inserted through the enlarged cervix into the uterus. The abortion provider then uses the forceps instrument to dismember the fetus by seizing a leg or arm and twisting it until it tears off and can be pulled out of the uterus. This will continue until only the head remains. Finally the skull is crushed and also pulled out. The body parts must then be reassembled to ensure that the entire baby has been removed.


[img width=500 height=383]http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I/Techniques/images/DE23-01.jpg[/img]
[img width=500 height=383]http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I/Techniques/images/DE23-02.jpg[/img]
[img width=500 height=383]http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I/Techniques/images/DE23-03.jpg[/img]
[img width=500 height=383]http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I/Techniques/images/DE23-04.jpg[/img]

[mannyamador]

The Case Against Abortion: Unwantedness
http://www.abort73.com/HTML/I-D-1-unwantedness.html

One of the favorite mantras of abortion advocates around the country is "Every Child a Wanted Child". It sounds noble enough, until you realize what their solution to unwantedness is. If a child isn't wanted, they argue, then it shouldn't be born. The problem, of course, is that the child is already conceived, and the only way to keep said child from being born is to kill it. How do they justify such violence? Often by arguing that it is better for the child to be dead than for the child to be unwanted.

This is a bogus argument. It doesn't work for the simple fact that no one makes such an argument about children after birth. Whoever heard Planned Parenthood or the National Organization for Women (NOW) argue that it would be better to kill children waiting for adoption rather than let them suffer through an "unwanted" life? If someone's right to life truly were established or removed based simply on their "wantedness", that would be the deathnell of homeless men and women around the nation.

Something as subjective as "wantedness" can never be the basis for granting someone the right to life, and abortion advocates know this. They don't argue that mothers should be free to kill their "unwanted" children after birth because they know these children are living, human beings with full rights of personhood. The only reason they argue that mothers should be free to kill their unwanted children before birth is because they're ignoring the scientific reality that these children, too, are living, human beings. The question is humanity, not wantedness.

Finally, it must never be forgotten, that the very discussion of "wantedness" in the first place ignores a substantial reality. There are no "unwanted" children in the broadest sense. Even if the biological parents want nothing to do with their offspring, there are families all over the nation waiting desperately to adopt a baby, families who are willing to adopt diseased babies of any race or ethnicity. This oft-cited notion of "unwantedness" is misleading and is utterly insufficient to justify even a single abortion.

[thyshop]

with the ever increasing population growth and poverty level..makatabang kaha ang abortion??

[Rance]

Yes.

[Motownkid]

HELL NO!

[Rance]

HELL YES.

[LytSlpr]

In Illinois they are encouraging adoptions than abortion with free pre-natal, support and delivery. Once the baby is born the baby has a matched parent. I don't know if this program is across the U.S. though.

This is a lesser evil compared to abortion and should be emulated worldwide.

[karljadon]

bitaw make adoption easy procedure sa mga tawo, diri lisod man kaayo intawn mag adopt ug streetchildren, kay ma segi man sunod ang mga social welfare dili ka maka decipline sa imong gi-adopt....kung naa pana adoption dinhi sa Philippines murag daghan ma save nga mga bata sa dalan, karon daghan na intawn kaayo nabuang sa rugby. kung na pa adopt unta sila sa mga responsible nga tawo, at least there are souls to save.....

kung ato tan-awon sa mga low or pobre gyud mga 4 - 6 ka mga anak ilang gibuhi, middle class 2-4 in the family, high class 1-3 in the family. kinsa man karon nag-antos ang mga pobre daghan pakan-on sa ilang uyamot nga panginabuhi. So abortion is become necessity for such condition specially if you belong to low class income even sa mga middle class....kung atong kwentahon kung naa kay 2 - 4 ka anak nag iskwela sa high school private plus college dili ka mabuang bisag unsa-on mathematic kuwang ra gyud atong sweldo bisan 20k above pa monthly nimo, tuition fee pa lang na daan. if happen imong anak namamdos as early age, I believe most filipino choose to save the baby, while in other countries like europe and other western country murag abortion gyud ilang buhaton ngano man abortion ila pili-on kay taas kaayo ilang responsibility sa ilang anak, to give a good life, education and everything is atmost important sa ilang anak, while philippines sa mga low income people as early age patrabaho-on na ang anak para makatabang sa ginikanan it means low responsibility, mao bitaw ang mga datu 1-3 ra gyud ilang anak para makahatag sila sa sakto nga kinabuhi......so culture - culture ra gyud ni sya....

[gaidinX]

NO NO NO. Promote adoption.

[crush_23]

NO...

[kyuusai]

Quote: Originally Posted by LytSlpr In Illinois they are encouraging adoptions than abortion with free pre-natal, support and delivery. Once the baby is born the baby has a matched parent. I don't know if this program is across the U.S. though. This is a lesser evil compared to abortion and should be emulated worldwide.

This should be contemplated as one of the solution rather than abortion.
Abortion is an immoral act. We all know as followers of Jesus Christ that it's a mortal sin. This legalization of abortion shouldn't be approved.

[chad_tukes]

i'd say YES, legalize it.

believe me, there are far more LAWS in our country that needs to be ILLEGALIZED than ABORTION.

[lordvhick]

kung kinsa man ang nag agree ani na balaud................#!!##*^$@#$$%$^@(*%#@^$@^%#$ *&%*&(namalikas na ko)..........unsa kaha kung pangutan on nako ang nag agree o nagpirma nai na balaud na mo sugot ba cya ang gi abort................

[sexyporsche]

RIGHT TO CHOICE

..just my opinion

[gshukaku]

No to abortion, imagina lang gud kung gipa abort ka sa imong mama sa una wala unta ta diri ron.