![]() |
|
|
#62
|
|
#63
|
|
|
||||||
|
#64
|
|
|
||||||
|
#69
|
|
Chipmunk@ correct ka dyan
pwede naman duha e apply but you have to check how many computer you have before applying tngli mu apply ug duha ka line then then gamai ra ug computers its going to be useless thats why as i recommended pwede ra isa ka line just limit the usage sa users. limit downloads or opening lots of video tabs sa browser in each computer, i think mu hinai ghpn since mu pugos ug kuha ug rate nga barato kai duha ka line ang gi apply.
|
|||||
|
#70
|
|
nya ug di pa kaayo sila maayo mo hapsay ana ilang network .. mao hinay jud na... ahehehheheh
pero bisan ug mag test mo cable nga alantect tag 15man ang meters ana, ug tag 7ang mater, kong parihabasila ug performance.. |
|||||
|
#71
|
|
yup tngli one of the causes na ma hinai
but dghn jud kaau causes not only sa physical layer nasad na sya sa configuring sa protocols sa network. Yup its true maybe naa na sya little improvement but ang pag configure jud sa network mauy kina important. |
|||||
|
#72
|
|
it is still an unshielded copper twisted wire. i have 7-peso cost cable network here assembled. drop tests on latency is below 1 millisecond per second. |
||||||
|
#73
|
|
|
||||||
|
#74
|
|
lol^^ are you telling me that you internet cafe operation is having a "heavy traffic" packet swaps in the network??!! you dont know what heavy traffic means. go to your ISP's server room, youll know what heavy traffic means. anyway, is the "basic and simple" network mapping your problem and being worried about in using the 7/mtr cost utp cable? haha! not with me. workstations here are mapped, ftp, shared, virtually connected, and private http streamings with 7/mtr cost utp cable used, no problem encountered. anyway, dont tell me those, i know those simple basics fyi. and by the way, "performance of networking are not always based on cost"... mind you that. |
||||||
|
#75
|
|
|
|||||||