![]() |
|
|
#13
|
|
ako... just being loyal to the great
, if "intel" may have surpassed amd in that level, it's just now, remember: karon pa sila ("intel") nka surpass after 2-3 years since gi release ang Athlon 64, misag way back sa mga bartons.Sa pagka karon lng ni mga bros. nga taas sila. By the time ma surpass napud nila ang ungas..... AMD napud akong makita sa mga threads. Anyways i still go for AMD, "the ferrari of processors." [img width=500 height=333]http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DigitalMedia/43312C-01_CN1_0953.jpg[/img] :mrgreen: |
||||
|
#14
|
|
anyways..it wud another couple or more of years ( hopefully ) b4 AMD with its bulldozer cores can reach ( and hopefully surpass ) the performance of todays C2D..but nevertheless..do not forget abot the NEHALEM core.. if that is still not enough..the 80core single die processor intel is currently developing ( there's an operational chip running win xp ) from ground up..and sad to say..if AMD will not catch in 2 years time..intel fans will be spending a lot just to buy a standard an entry level NEHALEM... and ur amd is gud..but at the moment..INTEL is way much better... as u may find it..the fastest phenom X4 is not even a match to a 2year old C2Q6600 in any marks. and BE64000+ is not a match compared to a PD E2180 @4ghz in stockheatsink.. .....this reply is not fanboyism..its based on facts that u may find using www.google.com |
||||||